A freeman was a person who was not bound to the land or obligated to provide labor to a lord, while a serf was a person who was bound to the land and required to provide labor to a lord in exchange for protection. Freemen had more freedom and autonomy compared to serfs who had limited rights and mobility.
The serf worked in the fields all day, bound to the land and serving the lord of the manor.
The serf worked tirelessly in the fields for his lord, without hope of escaping his feudal obligations.
A vassal is a free person who enters into a mutual agreement with a lord to provide military or other services in exchange for land, while a serf is a peasant who is bound to the land and obligated to work for a lord in exchange for protection and security. Vassals have more autonomy and legal rights compared to serfs.
The difference between 22 and 25 is 3.
Constitution law refers to the body of laws that interpret and apply a country's constitution. The constitution, on the other hand, is the fundamental law of a country that outlines the structure of the government, sets out the rights of citizens, and defines the powers of the government. In short, constitution law deals with the interpretation and application of the constitution.
freeholders pay taxes . serfs work for their land
he pays his debt to the person he serves
A peasant and a serf are the same thing entirely.
A freeman was a tenant farmer who paid rent and had no duties to perform for the lord of the land. He worked hard, and had a life not all that different from a serf's. A freeman would have the advantage over a serf of being able to determine what work he was going to do on any given day. By contrast, the serf spent three or four days each week working for the lord or on common land. A freeman had the right to move off the land if he decided to do so, once his lease was up; the downside being the lord could arbitrarily tell him to leave when the lease was up. By contrast, the serf was bound to the land, and neither he nor the lord could unilaterally move him away. The freeman was technically required to protect himself in times of trouble. The serf was theoretically protected. A freeman could aspire to earn enough money to buy his own property. This would make him a yeoman, who did not have to pay rent, but could be called up in wartime to be an archer. There is a link below.
A serf was a peasant who was bound to the land they worked on and who owed labor and allegiance to a lord. A servant, on the other hand, is someone employed to perform household or personal duties for others. The key distinction is that a serf's status was tied to the land, whereas a servant's role was based on employment.
Great question! Saoirseach (a freeman) is contrasted with Daoirseach (a serf, a slave). The word is used in both Scottish Gaelic and Irish.
Serfs were morelike poor peasants,and noble people's children were moreimportant,because their families had land and money.
1st AnswerA medieval freeman was a person that was given some land in return for services to the king. A freeman had fifteen strips of land in each field but in return he had to work to pay for it, help with the ploughing at harvest and help give out duties to Peasants. A freeman could leave the site without permission of the manor lord and could marry anyone, even from a different manor. Another answer:A freeman was a peasant farmer who was not bound by the manorial obligations that serfs had. He rented his land as what was called a copyholder, meaning that he had a lease. While he did not have the serf's obligations, he also did not have the serf's rights, and could be put off his farm when his lease expired. There is a link below to the section of an article on serfs dealing with freemen.
A man is an adult male human while a freeman has been released from a condition of slavery.
Almost nothing. But a citizen is man of a town, city, village, etc. A freeman may or may not even live in a town, city, village, etc. He may always be moving.
A Franklin was a freeman who owned land, but was not of noble birth. So not a noble, but not a serf, this is the origin of the term 'middle class'. Most franklins were farmers.
a serf helped a vassal because the serf came with the vassals land and that helped him with the land and any other needs for land he was not a slave but one step above the slave