A mere representation is a statement made during negotiations but it may not form part of the contract. A mere representation (if breach) will not give rise to contractual liability whereas a term of the contract will.
A simple contract is one that is very basic and on paper with signatures. A mere agreement may only be verbal.
A simple contract is one that is very basic and on paper with signatures. A mere agreement may only be verbal.
There is no difference.
A mere puff is an exaggerated statement or claim made in advertising or promotional material that is not meant to be taken literally. It is a form of hyperbole used to enhance the appeal of a product or service.
ta mere
Nothing really, a 'mere' refers to a small lake or pond.
If the term is enforceable under the contract then it is a term. if it was merely something said to induce a person to enter into a contract it is a pre-contractual statement.
A mere puff is a statement which does not have any legal relations.A breach of a mere puff will not give rise to liabilities. A term if breach whill give rise to legal liabilities and the innocent party is entitled to sue the person who was in breach of contract , hence this innocent party will recover the damages for which there was a breach.
In computer language, I perceive the difference between "see" and "view" as the difference between "see" (mere ocular recognition) and "read". For instance, "Click one of the documents you see on the screen to view it".
In legal terms, for an acceptance to be valid, it must be communicated through words or conduct that clearly demonstrate agreement to the terms of an offer. Simply thinking about acceptance without expressing it is not sufficient for a legally binding contract to be formed. Communication is key in contract law.
madarchod mere paas answer hota to tere ko loda puchta... answer.com sucks
they are not, unless recorded in agreement, its all hearsay.