Scientific fact is sometimes wrong from The Bible's perspective
Laws are sometimes wrong, as Martin Luther king once said "One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws." - MLK
A scientific theory is accepted as factual even though it hasn't been proven. A scientific law has been proven as fact.
a hypothesis is a scientific word for prediction. An opinion is something someone says that is not a fact.
Because a conclusion indicates that it is no longer a theory, but a proven fact. A theory is an unproven hypothesis.
Charles Darwin's greatest scientific contribution is his work on the Theory of Evolution. Without it, the fact that plants and animals evolved from its ancestors would not have been discovered.
A scientific theory is an experiment that still needs to be tested, but is believed to be true. A hypothesis is a fact and data based guess as to what the result(s) of an experiment will be. A scientific law is proven to be true and states that the results of the experiment will always be the same, and needs no further testing. An example of a scientific theory is the cell theory, which states that all living things are composed of at least one cell and that cells come from other cells.
law is based on fact theory is a concept/idea
law is based on fact theory is a concept/idea
A clue is a datum - a fact. A "theory" tries to tell you what the fact means.
law is based on fact theory is a concept/idea
theory or fact that of course is influenced by a theory
A scientific theory is a theory, no given proof of being a fact, a scientific law is what always happens, essentially a fact. Both is in chemistry and physics. The theory of gravitation happens before it became the Law of gravitation. Scientific theories and laws are similar except laws were proven to be recognize as a fact.
A scientific law is an indisputable fact: there are no observances dictating it. For example, gravity is a scientific law. A scientific theory is simply a generally accepted explanation for a particular phenomenon or idea that cannot currently be proven or disproven. The structure of the atom and evolution are theories.
The Darwinian theory is based on Scientific methodology. This is a fact not an issue for belief.
The idea of evolution is that evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution by natural selection explains much about the fact of evolution. Your question is ill posed. A more modern phrase would say your question is malformed. How could the fact of evolution be a threat to anything? How could the theory that is the backbone of biology not be one of the greatest progressions in science? Much confusion between fact and theory. Theory explains fact and encompasses fact and is a higher scientific concept than fact.
The hypothesis that stands the test of time forms a theory.This theory keeps on suggesting new hypotheses and many scientists exert greater efforts to disprove it but if it survives this doubtful approach,it becomes a law.A law is a uniform or constant fact of nature.It is an irrifutable theory.
A scientific theory is accepted as factual even though it hasn't been proven. A scientific law has been proven as fact.
after its been evaluated and tested repeatedly