Want this question answered?
i need help trying to find out whats the difference between a general science question then a testable question ?
The difference between a general interest science question and a testable question would be: A general question would be like "Whats your favorite TV show. And a testable question would be like "Will my experiment work or not?
That is a failed hypothesis. Although this sounds like a bad thing, in science it is actually an example of good science. The philosopher Karl Popper declared that real science was defined by hypothesis that could be tested and proven false or true. For example you can make a hypothesis that the falling speed of a body is proportional to its mass. The hypothesis can be put to test and shown false. This was the difference in World view between Aristoteles and Gallilei: Aristoteles put forward the hypothesis and Galilei tested it. Pseudo-science like astrology, religion, philosophy, politics and so on does not put forward testable hypothesis. No pseudo-science dare to put forward a testable hypothesis.
Proposition is a broad statement drawn from a theory, whereas a hypothesis takes this one step further and formulates a more specific statement that is empirically testable. Proposition states a relationship between two concepts, and a hypothesis operationalizes this relationship and puts it in an empirically testable form.
The answer is that a NONtestable experiment is when you can not test it. A testABLE experiment is when you can test it. It is like a able is when you are able to to it and when you non it is not able but the word nontestABLE is NOT able!! It is so funny WOW!! LOL!!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!??!?!
A scientific hypothesis has to be testable.
i need help trying to find out whats the difference between a general science question then a testable question ?
The null hypothesis is the default hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that there is no difference between the control group and the treatment group. The research hypothesis proposes that there is a significant difference between the control group and the treatment group.
The difference is that working hypothesis is that your still working on it but the hypothesis that your not working on it.
A proposition is a logically sound assertion that makes a connection/s between concepts. Propositions cannot be tested for validity; a hypothesis is a logical assertion, that can, but has not yet been tested. Propositions are the framework upon which hypothesis are made. Propositions also, because of their characteristic of not being testable, do not have to be supported by empirical evidence. Hypothesis on the other hand, do.
A hypothesis is a testable proposition that describes a potential relationship between events. It is a statement that can be tested through scientific methods to determine its validity. Hypotheses are often used in research to guide investigations and draw conclusions based on evidence.
The difference between a general interest science question and a testable question would be: A general question would be like "Whats your favorite TV show. And a testable question would be like "Will my experiment work or not?
Groups of scientific statements about the cell and the relationship between organisms and cells is call an hypothesis. An hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon which is testable.
Yes it is testable, because both the moon phase and the weather are observable and quantifiable variables. Therefore, their covariability can be determined and this hypothesis tested.
Hypothesis is singular, while Hypotheses is the plural of Hypothesis.
A hypothesis is testable when we can determine experientially whether it is likely to be false or more likely to be true. That means we must be able to distinguish between it being true or false observationally. Thus, equally important to finding observations that confirm the hypothesis, we must be able to specify what it is we expect to see in the case that the hypothesis is false: the hypothesis must be falsifiable in order to be testable.It must be able to be proved right or wrong.
That is a failed hypothesis. Although this sounds like a bad thing, in science it is actually an example of good science. The philosopher Karl Popper declared that real science was defined by hypothesis that could be tested and proven false or true. For example you can make a hypothesis that the falling speed of a body is proportional to its mass. The hypothesis can be put to test and shown false. This was the difference in World view between Aristoteles and Gallilei: Aristoteles put forward the hypothesis and Galilei tested it. Pseudo-science like astrology, religion, philosophy, politics and so on does not put forward testable hypothesis. No pseudo-science dare to put forward a testable hypothesis.