Reliable indicates that each time the experiment is conducted, the same results are obtained (accuracy). Valid indicates the experiment (or test) has controlled variables and used an appropriate method/model.
A valid test measures what it claims to measure, while a reliable test produces consistent results over time. A test can be valid but not reliable if it is measuring the correct thing but yielding inconsistent results. Conversely, a test can be reliable but not valid if it consistently measures the same thing, but not what it claims to measure.
No, for a test to be valid, it must also be reliable. Reliability refers to the consistency of the test results, while validity refers to the accuracy of the test in measuring what it is supposed to measure. A test cannot be valid if it is not reliable.
A bathroom scale that consistently shows your weight as 10 pounds less than your actual weight, but always produces the same result when you step on it multiple times, can be considered reliable (consistent) but not valid (accurate).
A reliable test is one that consistently produces similar results when administered multiple times to the same group of individuals. It is important for a test to be reliable so that the results can be trusted and used for making decisions. Factors that can influence test reliability include test length, clear instructions, and standardization of administration.
Validity of a test refers to the ability of test to test what it is supposed to test
No, a multiple choice test may not effectively assess manipulative skills as it typically requires written or verbal responses rather than practical demonstrations. Hands-on assessments or performance-based evaluations are typically more valid for assessing manipulative skills.
In my view reliable test is always valid.
No, for a test to be valid, it must also be reliable. Reliability refers to the consistency of the test results, while validity refers to the accuracy of the test in measuring what it is supposed to measure. A test cannot be valid if it is not reliable.
A test may be reliable yet not valid, The results can end up being reliable, in other words certain to have yielded properly based on input. But the results may not be trustworthy.
A reliable measure is consistent and yields consistent results, so it may not be measuring the intended construct accurately (lack validity). On the other hand, a valid measure accurately assesses the intended construct, but it must be consistent and produce stable results (reliable) to ensure that the measurements are dependable and trustworthy.
I think that with reliability we mean that the plans tha you propose are based on some spesific and realistic elements. With validity I think that we mean that these elements are true and modern.
A bathroom scale that consistently shows your weight as 10 pounds less than your actual weight, but always produces the same result when you step on it multiple times, can be considered reliable (consistent) but not valid (accurate).
what is the difference between proffiency and diagnostic test
what is the difference between proffiency and diagnostic test
Given any two groups there will usually be random variations in their scores. A proper statistical test is designed to assess whether the observed difference is likely to be a result of such random variation or if it due to a genuine - reliable - difference between the groups.
The difference between a test and a demonstration is that a test is to be taken and answered and a demonstration is to be demonstrated and be told to the class
Can you tell the difference between Vyvanse and Concerta in a drug test
There is lot of difference between test flight/air test/first flight.