From a cinematic/storytelling point-of-view, the term 'werewolf' is generally used when the creature itself is a quadruped, resembling a wolf more than a human. 'Wolfman' tends to be used when the creature is bipedal and still roughly-humanoid, usually (much like the Hulk) with it's modesty still miraculously covered by what's left of its shirt and trousers. All-in-all, they're intended to be same thing, it just depends on the author/director's particular vision; I'm not aware of any continuity where both versions co-exist.
There is no difference between the two terms. The word 'were' derives from the word 'wer' meaning man. This makes the literal translation of 'werewolf' as 'manwolf'. This is pretty much the same as saying wolfman.
Apparently Lycan inherit their condition, being in a line of descent from King Lycon unless there bitten from another Lycan which soon after they will inherit it. They seen to lack the rage of the typical werewolf and can change on demand. With the werewolf they still have part of a human body and not as strong and have to change on a full moon. While Lycan's are stronger and fast with no apart human body look.Lycans are born into being a werewolf, only they are not proper werewolves if you like the originals, as lycans can choose when they change, werewolves on the other hand are born human, but then turned into a werewolf by another werewolf, and they change when the moon is full or whenever the change occurs, depending on which stories you want to believe are true.
No
A human becomes a werewolf when s/he is bitten by another werewolf. But in most cases a werewolf is born into being a werewolf. A Vampire becomes a werewolf when s/he is bitten by a werewolf and then that werewolf smashes the Vampires head in. The reason I know is because I am a Were-vamp(Werewolf/Vampire) And I am The youngest out of my "tribe"(pack).I am 11 years old. I swear on my first born child's education that every thing I said is true.
A red-claw werewolf is a werewolf in red-claw that is based on a book by Kitty Kat
Nobody is a werewolf they are not real they are just in stories.
Isn't that basically the same thing....
Be a wolfman and join the X-Men.
One is a Dragon.
No! SAME THING! onLY NOT rated! UPDATE; I think you'll find the unrated version has some extra scenes not in the rated version.
if u want to check wat is werewolf and wolfman watch on star one pyaar ki yeh ek kahani you'll find all ur ans. .
The cast of Watered Down Wolfman - 2010 includes: Jonathan Earl as Werewolf Of Nashville Abbie McEnturff as Damsel In Distress Larry Underwood as Dr. Gangrene
Two popular werewolf movies from 2009 are "The Wolfman" and "New Moon," part of the Twilight series featuring vampires and werewolves.
The difference between the werewolves and wolfs is that a wolf is a real animal. You can see a wolf out in nature or the zoo. A werewolf on the other hand is fictional. It is a person who changes into a wolf during a full moon.
a werewolf is a wolf who is not naturaly a wolf but changes into one. It occures (mythicaly of course) when you are the seventh son of the seventh son of the seventh son
A lycean or Lycantrope is a decendent of King Lycaon by the normal means of descent. These people inherit their condition. A werewolf acquires their condition via the saliva bite.
From a cinematic/storytelling point-of-view, the term 'werewolf' is generally used when the creature itself is a quadruped, resembling a wolf more than a human. 'Wolfman' tends to be used when the creature is bipedal and still roughly-humanoid, usually (much like the Hulk) with it's modesty still miraculously covered by what's left of its shirt and trousers. All-in-all, they're intended to be same thing, it just depends on the author/director's particular vision; I'm not aware of any continuity where both versions co-exist.
No. There are No such thing as Real werewolves. They are just the work of fiction. If a real wolf bites you, you will bleed and maybe get rabies! You will Never turn into a werewolf, or a wolfman, or a vampire.