answersLogoWhite

0

The idea is that a King rules a country while an Emperor rules an empire, and empires are made up of more than one country. In practice, these definitions can be applied in various ways. Some countries are larger than some empires, since there is no specific defined size for a country to be. One really large country could be larger than ten small countries. So in some situations, a king might be a greater ruler than an emperor. But the idea is, emperors claim to be greater.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why did problems develop between the roman catholic church and the kings and emperors in the west?

Billy Billy Billy


How did some Mesopotamia kings become emperors?

Some Mesopotamian kings became emperors because of a few different reasons. These include the class systems, being seen as gods by the people, and claiming divinity themselves.


What is the difference between kings and vagabonds?

Vagabonds are basically hobos. Kings are... royal.


Which animal provided the fur for the coats of emperors and kings?

The Sable provided the fur for the costs for Kings and Emperors. Other animals that provided coats were foxes, minks, and raccoons.


Did the Aztecs have a king?

Yes, although they were emperors not kings.


Why were the british kings not called emperors?

They were, from 1877 to 1948.


Who ruled china for most of its historys?

Kings and Emperors.


What was on major difference between the powers of the emperors in the east and the West?

The Codex which is the fountain for modern law.


What was the major difference between the powers of emperors in the east and the west?

The Codex which is the fountain for modern law.


Were the roman kings worshipped?

No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.


Who are the Hohenzollern?

A family of kings and emperors of Prussia, Germany, and Romania.


Which group is was more successful in ruling rome kingsemperorsor roman republic?

It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.