Renewable resources, like trees and collected rainwater can be used to produce energy without an opportunity for them to be exhausted -- since the water will be replenished by rain and new trees will grow where the old ones were cut. Non renewable resources, like oil pumped from the ground and coal deposits in coal mines were accumulated over millions of years and cannot be replaced once consumed. Both you and me will probably be around to see the next raining season or even see the next generation of trees in a forest grow up. But neither of us will be around to see today's creatures become oil, millions of years from now. And that is the true difference.
renewable source of energy can be regenerated but non-renewable source of energy can not be regenerated.
The difference between renewable and nonrenewable energy is: renewable doesn't make pollution, and also you don't have to spend fuel or other stuff just to generate electricity.
euklhtl3uiruneuo;
The difference between the 2 resources ANYWHERE in the world are that a renewable resource may be replaced within 100 years, say a forest, while a non-renewable resource takes much longer, oil for instance, which takes hundreds of thousands or millions of years to form.
Yes.
no marble is nonrenewable
Sulphur is non-renewable but almost inexhaustible.
non renewable
Non renewable
soil is a non renewable resource
Non renewable
No - it is non-renewable