0
What is the different between proactive and reactive management?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Proactive means addressing trouble before it happens, whereas reactive means dealing with crises as they come. Proactive tends to be better since there will be less crises to deal with. You cannot prevent all crises, but you can reduce the chances of certain ones that are caused by poor planning.
Examples of proactive management include:
1. Thorough background checks as opposed to hiring anyone and regularly firing employees and/or having them arrested for theft.
2. Budgeting for equipment failure or having spare parts/equipment on hand as opposed to shutting down your production until you are able to get things repaired or replaced.
3. Thoroughly training your employees for even rare circumstances rather than "winging it" and exposing them to unknown situations with a risk that they will make the wrong decisions.
4. Budgeting for things such as tax hikes, unforeseen expenses, funding cuts, or whatever as opposed to figuring out how to handle such things when they suddenly occur.
5. Having a good PR team and attorneys on hand to monitor for certain types of problems before they become large ones. For instance, if there is defamation starting, good attorneys can head it off before it gets worse and the PR team can do their best to repair the damage.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Explain with examples the difference between proactive action and reactive action in the concept of TQM?
Proactive action is self initiated behavior at work place, while reactive action in the response of the complaint/feedback
What is the difference between proactive and reactive public relations?
Put simply, a proactive policy involves making a sacrifice now for an uncertain future. It is doing something that can or would prevent a future problem. For example, saving money in a bank account. But being too proactive can be seen as paranoid. A reactive policy however, involves taking action after the problem has already risen. Just remember everything has costs and benefits.
What is different between management and organization?
Management is the process of cordinating organasational recourse together using the management functions which are planning, organising, leading.
What is different between traditional management and strategic management?
Traditional management follows the style that has always been in place. Strategic management is tailored to suit the modern day's problems.
What is the difference between Human Resource Management and Personnel Management?
There is not a really big difference between Human Resource Management and Personnel Management, in actual fact "Human Resources" have largely replaced the term "Personnel Management". Human Resource Management is basically much broader in scope than Personnel Management. Human Resource Management could be described in two ways. Strategic and Proactive. The reason being that there strategies are ongoing and they constantly work towards managing and developing an organisations workforce. It can be seen as Proactive because of their continuous development and functions to improve the company's workforce. Human Resource Management is the type of Management where almost everybody in Managing Position can play a part in Training and Development. They aim to have many different Managers in various departments with the necessary skills to handle employee tasks at hand. Personnel Management can be described as reactive. The reason why I would say this is because of the way they operate. An example of this would be that they respond to demands and concerns as they are presented. Personnel Management could also be seen as a independent way of managing. It is a sole responsibility of the organisation. Quoted: "When a difference between personnel management and human resources is recognized, human resources is described as much broader in scope than personnel management. Human resources is said to incorporate and develop personnel management tasks, while seeking to create and develop teams of workers for the benefit of the organization. A primary goal of human resources is to enable employees to work to a maximum level of efficiency. Personnel management can include administrative tasks that are both traditional and routine. It can be described as reactive, providing a response to demands and concerns as they are presented. By contrast, human resources involves ongoing strategies to manage and develop an organization's workforce. It is proactive, as it involves the continuous development of functions and policies for the purposes of improving a company's workforce. Personnel management is often considered an independent function of an organization. Human resource management, on the other hand, tends to be an integral part of overall company function. Personnel management is typically the sole responsibility of an organization's personnel department. With human resources, all of an organization's managers are often involved in some manner, and a chief goal may be to have managers of various departments develop the skills necessary to handle personnel-related tasks. As far as motivators are concerned, personnel management typically seeks to motivate employees with such things as compensation, bonuses, rewards, and the simplification of work responsibilities. From the personnel management point of view, employee satisfaction provides the motivation necessary to improve job performance. The opposite is true of human resources. Human resource management holds that improved performance leads to employee satisfaction. With human resources, work groups, effective strategies for meeting challenges, and job creativity are seen as the primary motivators."
What is the difference between proactive safety management and reactive safety management?
Proactive safety is seeing and preventing an event before it happens. Reactive management is waiting for the accident to happen, then make corrections
Explain proactive and reactive planning in detail?
The difference between proactive and reactive has to do with when the action takes place. Proactive means a preventative action occurs to stop something from happening, reactive means something is done as a response to something that has happened.
What Differences exist between proactive purchasing and reactive purchasing?
Proactive purchasing is when you are for the product and reactive purchasing is when you react badly to the product. This is a consumer's way of thinking.
How does reactive patrol differ between proactive patrol?
A proactive patrol is out on the streets, looking to see if anything is happening. A reactive patrol waits for something to be reported, and then goes straight to investigate it.
Explain with examples the difference between proactive action and reactive action in the concept of TQM?
Proactive action is self initiated behavior at work place, while reactive action in the response of the complaint/feedback
What is the difference between proactive and reactive investigations?
The most significant way in which they differ is that Reactive investigations happen when the crime occurs and then the police responds, or reacts to the crime, while in Proactive investigations, the police gets involved in the crime before it happens. Reactive investigation reacts to the crime after it has been committed, and Proactive investigations acts before it is committed in a way to prevent it.
What is the different between reactive and non reactive metals?
one reacts and one doesn't
What is the difference between proactive and reactive public relations?
Put simply, a proactive policy involves making a sacrifice now for an uncertain future. It is doing something that can or would prevent a future problem. For example, saving money in a bank account. But being too proactive can be seen as paranoid. A reactive policy however, involves taking action after the problem has already risen. Just remember everything has costs and benefits.
Different between proactive and reactive?
Being reactive would be to blame your circumstances on what goes on around you vs. being proactive which is knowing and taking action on the belief that your future is decided based on your own life choices not on what goes on around you. A simple example would be if you were in a scenario where you want to buy a house but you don't have good enough credit. A reactive person would mope about it and blame all their problems on their circumstances and just decide that life is not fair and there's nothing to do about it. A proactive person would note the problem, and do everything in their power to fix it, whether that be getting an extra part time job in order to earn more, or paying off credit debt, or whatever needs to be done to fix the problem. And you can say that proactive is the person who is thinks before happening the event or reactive person is the person who wait for the things happened and then he take the action according to the situation.
What will happen when different voltage droop generator synchronised?
They will run with different reactive power output, i.e. reactive load won't be equally shared between units.
5 When do you utilize reactive crisis management What role does PR play in reactive crisis management?
# Reactive, meaning, "to trigger reaction" is used in the preparation of an organization for the unwelcome or the unexpected. Reactive Crisis Management is exercised by corporations after an incident that can damage their reputation of it occurs. PR plays a crucial role in such situations because it is the communication link between the company's management, employees, the media, government agencies, and legal entities; it is all done by the Public Relations Personnel. The performance of PR during such situations can mean the salvation or the demise of a corporation.
What is the relationship between social policy and social problem?
Social policy is the government's response to social problems. Social problems are issues affecting a large segment of society, such as poverty or homelessness, that require intervention through policies like welfare programs or affordable housing initiatives. Effective social policies can help address social problems by providing support, resources, and solutions to those in need.
