Want this question answered?
peace
In western Europe absolutism was enforced as opposed to Eastern Europe where there was some form of absolutism but not to a full extent it was leaning more towards serfdom.
objectivism is ayn rand pihilopshy, read "anthemn" and find out more.
Objectivism is a philosophy that values reason, individualism, and self-interest. In practice, someone who adheres to objectivism might make decisions based on logic and rationality, prioritize their own well-being, and emphasize personal autonomy and freedom.
ETHICAL OBJECTIVISM In ethical objectivism moral values and virtues are intrinsic, not dependent on anything outside of them. In ethical objectivism moral law is uncreated and eternal and not subject to any will, divine or human. (One form of ethical objectivism is moral absolutism.) No will can lessen the consequence of acts against the law. There is no grace in ethical objectivism. In order to avoid punishment, one must perfect one's life and follow the law perfectly. The law of karma, continuous birth, death and rebirth until such moral perfection is reached, appears to be the ultimate expression of ethical objectivism. In Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism, for most people one lifetime is not enough for such moral perfection. The "Law of Karma" holds that if people act in evil ways, that evil will eventually return to them. Conversely, if people do good deeds, then they will advance in spiritual progress. This is connected to reincarnation, where those with a "negative balance" in good deeds will come back in a lower position in society or the animal world. Ethical subjectivism, as we have seen above, is the opposite of ethical objectivism. Subjectivism says that the moral values are dependent on a human or divine will, that they can change from one situation to another. Please note that a large majority of Christians, Jews, and Muslims believe in moral absolutism, which is a form of ethical objectivism. Also note that Buddhists may have a weaker definition of the law of karma. For some Buddhists it may simply mean that actions have consequences. When it comes to deciding whether Aristotle, Confucius, and the Buddha are ethical objectivists or subjectivists, you should focus on the following questions: (1) For Aristotle and Confucius who or what tells us the right action? (2) What is the role that God plays for Aristotle and Heaven for Confucius? and (3) Does "relative to" me in each of these thinkers undermine ethical objectivism?
Enlightened absolutism was a form of absolute monarchy. It began to fail because of a struggle of ideals between the rulers and countries involved.
eastern absolutism had serfdom as its main form of income while western absolutism had the textile industry
why is the distinction between insurable and uninsurable risks is significant for the theory of profit
this is what i found.. Ethical objectivism is in opposition to moral realism, which claims that moral propositions refer to objective facts - independent of human opion -- (deals with morals)
NO
A cell wall is the primary distinction between plant and animal cells.
The major distinction in this system is between consumer and industrial products.