Want this question answered?
Viruses are not alive in the first place, so no.
Easy answer: Bacteria are alive and viruses probably are not.
Biologists don't use binomial nomenclature to name viruses because binomial nomenclature is reserved for living things. Viruses are not considers alive.
No, they are not alive at all.
Need a host.
It is not known weather or not viruses exchange gases but if we knew we would know or have a clue if viruses were alive or not alive
No, because viruses aren't alive.
Since viruses are not alive, they are not named by a genus or a species.
Viruses are not alive in the first place, so no.
-viruses and alive but bacteria is -viruses spread but dont multiply or change in your body, bacteria are alive and are often evolving -viruses cannot be treated, but bacteria can be eliminated with chemincals and anitbiotics
i
bacteria is but for viruses some scientists believe they are alive and others think they dont so i can't give you an answer to that
Certainly not. It is a hotly debated subject. Viruses (and prions for that matter) are not alive in a conventional sense.
Viruses are not an organism at all. They are not alive.
Since viruses are not alive they can not have life processes.
Viruses are not alive and so do not sleep. They can become inactive for a while.
-viruses and alive but bacteria is -viruses spread but dont multiply or change in your body, bacteria are alive and are often evolving -viruses cannot be treated, but bacteria can be eliminated with chemincals and anitbiotics