Want this question answered?
The smaller object will have a larger acceleration than the larger object. This is because, from Newton's second law, the acceleration of a body is given by: a = F/m where a is acceleration F is resultant force and m is mass F is constant, so acceleration is inversely proportional to mass. Hence, the smaller object will have a larger acceleration.
Actually the smaller ball would have more accleration because the smaller ball weighs less.....
Force = (mass) x (acceleration) Acceleration = (force) / (mass) With the same force applied, a smaller mass has greater acceleration. A baseball has less mass than a shot has, so the same force gives it greater acceleration.
As an object rises WITH air resistance, the acceleration is larger in size than g, because both gravity and air resistance will be causing a downward acceleration. As the object FALLS with air resistance, the acceleration will be smaller in size than g, because gravity and resistance will be opposing each other. Because of the smaller acceleration being applied over the same distance, the return speed will be slower than the launch speed.
A falling rock in vacuum accelerates at 9.8 meters per second2 ... the acceleration of gravity at the earth's surface.A falling rock in air has a smaller acceleration than in vacuum, because of air resistance;the exact figure depends on the rock's weight and shape.A falling rock in water has an even smaller acceleration than it air, because of water resistance; the exact figure again depends on the rock's weight and shape.
theoretical probability can be smaller than expiremental like this say you toss a coin 4 times it lands on head 3 times that means the theoretical 1/2 is now smaller than the expiremental 3/4
because of variable in the situation '
The experimental probability of anything cannot be answered without doing it, because that is what experimental probability is - the probability that results from conducting an experiment, a posteri. This is different than theoretical probability, which can be computed a priori. For instance, the theoretical probability of rolling a 3 is 1 in 6, or about 0.1667, but the experimental probability changes every time you run the experiment
The experimental probability of an event is the probability that is calculated from repeated trials rather than from theoretical models.
The experimental probability of anything cannot be answered without doing it, because that is what experimental probability is - the probability that results from conducting an experiment, a posteri. This is different than theoretical probability, which can be computed a priori. For instance, the theoretical probability of rolling an even number is 3 in 6, or 1 in 2, or 0.5, but the experimental probability changes every time you run the experiment.
The smaller object will have a larger acceleration than the larger object. This is because, from Newton's second law, the acceleration of a body is given by: a = F/m where a is acceleration F is resultant force and m is mass F is constant, so acceleration is inversely proportional to mass. Hence, the smaller object will have a larger acceleration.
the experimental % oxygen would be lower because there would be more KCL in the simple than oxygen
Theoretical probability = 0.5 Experimental probability = 20% more = 0.6 In 50 tosses, that would imply 30 heads.
Smaller, because Mars is less massive and less dense than Earth.
Actually the smaller ball would have more accleration because the smaller ball weighs less.....
They are generally agreed to be theoretical and experimental probabilities. Probability is probability. The concept may be applied to any causal event which has more than one potential outcome.
A fully developed sea have waves that are bigger or smaller than the maximum theoretical size due to constructive or destructive interference. Factors that affect maximum wave size includes wind speed, wind duration, and fetch.