An experimental acceleration smaller than the theoretical acceleration could be due to errors in measurement, equipment limitations, or external factors affecting the experiment. It is important to carefully analyze the experimental setup, identify sources of error, and make adjustments to improve the accuracy of results.
The smaller object will have a larger acceleration than the larger object. This is because, from Newton's second law, the acceleration of a body is given by: a = F/m where a is acceleration F is resultant force and m is mass F is constant, so acceleration is inversely proportional to mass. Hence, the smaller object will have a larger acceleration.
Assuming all other factors are equal, a bigger ball would have the same acceleration as a smaller ball when subject to the same force. This is because acceleration is dependent on force and mass, and in this case, the increased mass of the bigger ball would require more force to achieve the same acceleration as the smaller ball.
Waves can be bigger or smaller than the maximum theoretical size due to factors such as the depth and shape of the seafloor, wind speed and direction, and interactions with other waves. These variables can cause waves to amplify or decrease in size as they travel across the ocean.
The experimental value may be either more or less than the theoretical value. Reasons for such differences:The theory may be incomplete, or a simplified version of reality. For example, you may use the ideal gas law; but real gases only behave APPROXIMATELY like the "ideal" gas. In the experiment, there may be measurement errors. Or there may be other variables, which "contaminate" the result.
The acceleration of the bullet is greater than the acceleration of the rifle because the bullet has a much smaller mass. Newton's second law, F=ma, states that the acceleration is inversely proportional to mass given the same force, so the smaller mass of the bullet results in a greater acceleration for the same force applied.
theoretical probability can be smaller than expiremental like this say you toss a coin 4 times it lands on head 3 times that means the theoretical 1/2 is now smaller than the expiremental 3/4
The experimental percent oxygen may be lower than the theoretical percent oxygen due to factors such as experimental error, incomplete reactions, or impurities in the sample. Variability in experimental conditions can influence the accuracy of the results obtained.
The experimental probability of anything cannot be answered without doing it, because that is what experimental probability is - the probability that results from conducting an experiment, a posteri. This is different than theoretical probability, which can be computed a priori. For instance, the theoretical probability of rolling a 3 is 1 in 6, or about 0.1667, but the experimental probability changes every time you run the experiment
The experimental probability of an event is the probability that is calculated from repeated trials rather than from theoretical models.
The experimental probability of anything cannot be answered without doing it, because that is what experimental probability is - the probability that results from conducting an experiment, a posteri. This is different than theoretical probability, which can be computed a priori. For instance, the theoretical probability of rolling an even number is 3 in 6, or 1 in 2, or 0.5, but the experimental probability changes every time you run the experiment.
Theoretical probability = 0.5 Experimental probability = 20% more = 0.6 In 50 tosses, that would imply 30 heads.
The smaller object will have a larger acceleration than the larger object. This is because, from Newton's second law, the acceleration of a body is given by: a = F/m where a is acceleration F is resultant force and m is mass F is constant, so acceleration is inversely proportional to mass. Hence, the smaller object will have a larger acceleration.
If a potassium chlorate sample is contaminated with KCl, the experimental percent oxygen would be lower than the theoretical percent oxygen. This is because KCl does not contain oxygen, so the contamination would dilute the amount of oxygen produced during the decomposition of potassium chlorate.
The experimental oxygen would be higher than the theoretical oxygen in a contaminated sample of potassium chlorate. This is because the moisture would contribute to the sample's weight when measured, resulting in a higher oxygen content calculation compared to the theoretical amount based on the chemical formula.
The acceleration due to gravity on Mars would be smaller than on Earth. This is because Mars has less mass than Earth, so its gravitational pull is weaker. On Mars, the acceleration due to gravity is about 3.71 m/s^2, while on Earth it is about 9.81 m/s^2.
Assuming all other factors are equal, a bigger ball would have the same acceleration as a smaller ball when subject to the same force. This is because acceleration is dependent on force and mass, and in this case, the increased mass of the bigger ball would require more force to achieve the same acceleration as the smaller ball.
If potassium chlorate is contaminated with KCl, the experimental percent oxygen would likely be lower than the theoretical value because KCl does not contain oxygen. This contamination would reduce the amount of oxygen available from the potassium chlorate during the reaction, thus lowering the experimental yield of oxygen.