The experimental value may be either more or less than the theoretical value. Reasons for such differences:The theory may be incomplete, or a simplified version of reality. For example, you may use the ideal gas law; but real gases only behave APPROXIMATELY like the "ideal" gas.
In the experiment, there may be measurement errors. Or there may be other variables, which "contaminate" the result.
Sure, after all it is a logarithmic scale.
Benjamin Thompson's experiment, where he showed that metal can be melted by friction produced by boring a cannon, disproved the caloric theory by demonstrating that heat could be produced by mechanical work rather than through the transfer of a mysterious fluid called caloric. This experiment challenged the prevailing understanding of heat as a fluid and supported the emerging kinetic theory of heat.
When acceleration is less than 0 and velocity is less than 0, the speed is positive. Speed is the absolute value of velocity, so it is always positive regardless of the direction of motion.
Max Planck conducted experiments on black-body radiation, leading him to develop the quantum theory of energy. This theory revolutionized the field of physics by introducing the concept that energy is quantized rather than continuous.
If I understand the question correctly, you are asking whether a scientify *theory* can be revised as new evidence is presented, and the answer is YES. This forms the entire foundation of science - any theory that cannot be revised is contrary to the scientific method; it has, in effect, become dogma. Any theory that cannot be demonstrated through the available evidence must be rejected. So, if a scientist discovers new data that invalidates a previously working theory, then that theory is rejected by the scientific community.
A value that is less than zero.A value that is less than zero.A value that is less than zero.A value that is less than zero.
5. It does not have a value greater than 12. Consequently, it does not have a value greater than 12 and less than 13.
9 is a square number less than 16. The number 9, in itself, has no probability since there is no "experiment" defined.9 is a square number less than 16. The number 9, in itself, has no probability since there is no "experiment" defined.9 is a square number less than 16. The number 9, in itself, has no probability since there is no "experiment" defined.9 is a square number less than 16. The number 9, in itself, has no probability since there is no "experiment" defined.
The answer depends on what the experiment is.The answer depends on what the experiment is.The answer depends on what the experiment is.The answer depends on what the experiment is.
They are the same - except that in "less", something has a value which is less than some implied value - often the current value. For example, "Please can you make less noise?" implies "Please can you make less noise than you are making now?"
The - before the 1 represents it is less, so the -1 will always be less than a, since the - is before the one, and so that means the 1 is less than a.
How can the price of a company's share be less than the face value of the share?" How can the price of a company's share be less than the face value of the share?"
A negative number is less than its absolute value.
Negative numbers are always less than their absolute value.
If a theory does not agree with the experiments designed to test it, than either the experiment is faulty and needs to be fixed or the theory needs to be reviewed and reconsidered..
Empiric
Five less than nine is four.