Want this question answered?
well, aside from being a part of China since the yuan dynasty (13th centry), Tibet is reconized as a city of China. Your question its basicly like what claim the US have for New YorkChina saw land and resource opportunity for themselves to take over Tibet. They knew that no one was going to stop them in invading Tibet.
no
In the 1700s France and England were in conflict over which of them would control North America. There were multiple battles over the years that lead to an all-out war in 1754.
1. Conflict over land.2. Religious Freedom3. Quaker beleif
historical change
Tibet and Okinawa used to be part of china
the country that took over Tibet is china
Pakistan has not taken over Tibet . They are both independent countries
China is the neighboring country that took over Tibet in 1950. Tibet had previously, in 1913, declared itself independent from China.
Revisionist or conflict perspective in historiography means that historical perspectives change over time and are dependent on biases of the writer.
China took over Tibet in 1951
Tibet is not free because China took it over.
In 1950, shortly after Mao Zedong came to power, the People's Liberation Army invaded and occupied the Eastern regions of Tibet, claiming that its territory was rightfully part of China. This began a disagreement between China and Tibet that lasts to this day over the sovereignty of Tibet.
The main languages spoken by Himalayan people vary depending on the region. In Nepal, the predominant language is Nepali, while in Bhutan it is Dzongkha, and in parts of India, it can be Hindi or regional languages like Sherpa in the Everest region. Additionally, many Himalayan communities speak languages specific to their ethnic group, such as Tibetan in Tibet.
Tibet is an inalienable part of Chinese territory since the 13th century.
The Dalailama was forced to escape from Tibet over the Himalayas to India as the Chinese invaded Tibet
PAKISTAN