Tibet is not free because China took it over.
China, for now. But Tibetans are fighting everyday to free Tibet from China's invasion
The country of Tibet has an autonomous government that reports to China. Tibet is thought to be a part of China but Tibetans say Tibet is an independent country.
No, Tibet is a country of it's own.
it depends where you are coming from Tibet is located in Southwest of China. even in China ,there are only serval cities that have flights to Tibet dirrectly : Chengdu , Xining, Xi'an, Kunming ,Beijing, Shanghai , Guangzhou. Zhongdian, outsde of China, only Kathmandu (Nepal) --Tibet other countries there is no flight to Tibet directly at all. or you can go to Tibet by train , through the highest railway : Qinghai --Tibet railway.
Tibet is a country! It's like almost saying what does China stand for? But Tibetan people want freedom for Tibet.
Free Tibet Campaign was created in 1987.
No, free isnt a verb.
yes, Tibet was an independent until 1959,and these days controlled by China.
There's the Free Tibet movement to end China's occupation of Tibet.
China, for now. But Tibetans are fighting everyday to free Tibet from China's invasion
This organization's goal is to help Tibet and the Tibetans gain independence (or at least autonomous rule) from China.
Free Tibet is a website about the country of Tiber. The website features information such as the region's culture, human rights, political activities, and other information.
Tibet surrendered but had an agreement to keep its regional self-government, have free religious beliefs, and no immediate change in the government.
only those which are under free license that isnt an answer
Realistically, China will never grant independence to Tibet. Bear in mind that there are already more Chinese people in Tibet than there are Tibetans. So even by a purely democratic vote of its current residents, Tibet would not now vote to secede from China.
tons of people-isnt it great to be free!
Tibet takes alot of its culture from India and if it were to be owned by anyone the Tibeten people would prefure India. As well as Tibet has native muslim populations which are oppressed in china. The state religion of Tibet is budhism and it has been heavilly oppressed in china, including the banning of reincarnation which was aimed specifically at the Dalai Lama. Tibet strategically though is in between China and India and if Tibet was not owned by China then Tibet would most likely be heavily allied to India and it would allow India to put bases in Tibet. If India has bases in Tibet then India could easily rush China in case of a war. As of right now China can defend there side of the Himmilaya and they would be able to stop India in case of a war, but if India has bases in Tibet, then India could easily take Chinas undefended plains and desert. Tibet is also highly priced by china for its water. China grows rice wich is a water heavy crop. If China gave Tibet up then theyed need water pretty badly. So China owns Tibet because it is a main tool for there survival and Tibet is not free because it isnt really worth anyone elses time to free them except maybe for India but that would only be if there already going to war with India. Looking at the histories of these nations Tibet is far different from China and is the home of the Dalai Lama and China owning Tibet harms the budhist religion. So Tibet should be a independent nation morally because the people of Tibet mostly want it and it is best for them, but Most likely that wont happen in the foreceably future because China will not give up Tibet because it is far to valuable to them.