The true foxes, of which there are about 12 species, belong to the genus Vulpes.
Vulpes Macrotis.
The Arctic fox is in the genus Vulpes - the true foxes. There are 12 species in this genus including the red fox and the fennec fox.
The Arctic Fox's ancestor is a fox resembling the Red Fox.
The genus of all dogs is Canis
Vulpes
Of course. They're both types of foxes, and you can tell because of their names.
Foxes have been thought to be in the dog family or the cat family but it is in neither, the real classification is Vulpine, which is a genus that shows resemblance to both categories but doesn't belong to either.
No, foxes are of a different family. Dogs are of the genus 'Canus' and foxes are of the genus 'Vulpes.'
It is of the genus 'Vulpes' which is, in fact, the fox family.
"Wild Fox" covers a variety of species, some in different genuses. However, all "true" foxes -- twelve current species -- are in the Genus Vulpes. The Kingdom, phylum, class, order, family and genus for these twelve "true" fox species are (in order) Animalia, Chordata, Mammalia, Carnivora, Canidae, Vulpes. The species for the 12 species of "true fox" are vulpes (Red Fox), bengalensis (Bengal Fox), cana (Blanford's Fox), chama (Cape Fox), corsac (Corsac Fox), zerda (Fennec Fox), macrotis (Kit Fox), pallida (Pale Fox), rueppellii (Rüppell's Fox), velox (Swift Fox), ferrilata (Tibetan Sand Fox)
No, the gray fox is in an entirely different genus from the red fox and would probably be incapable of producing offspring.
They are, in the family Canidae, which includes dogs, wolves, coyotes and jackals.If you are referring to the genus Canis, then no. Foxes are in the genus Vulpes.
I am not sure which species of sand fox you are referring to, however, both the Tibetan and Ruppells sand fox are in the genus Vulpes - and therefore are related to Fennec foxes.