Intent involves knowing and deliberate actions that move to the end goal of the crime. In criminal law, even if the crime was not culminated (i.e., because the person was caught in the act), the intent serves sufficient to fine/jail/and or incarcerate an individual - the attempt shows an intent to fulfill the crime.
To act by intention or design;
attempt
By "entering by breaking, or entering without breaking, the residence, business, premises, or property of another with the intent to commit a crime therein or thereon."
If you commit a crime, then you're breaking the law. If you call breaking the law a crime, then yes, you're committing a crime by committing a crime.Added; A criminal act is composed of two conscious acts: The Mens Reus (the criminal intent) and the Actus Reus (the criminal act). By committing the act you are completing the 2nd part of the offense necessary to convict you - therefore YES, you are engaged in committing a crime.But it's still a paradox. If you commit a crime by committing a crime, then wouldn't you be committing a crime for the committed crime for committing a crime> It goes on forever, but then final answer is YES.
The General principle says that in every crime there are four successive stages in its commisiion,viz., 1)Intention to commit a crime; 2)Preparation to commit a crime; 3)Attempt to commit a crime; and 4)The actual commisssion of the offence.
It certainly can be, IF it was done with criminal intent.
the motive
The crime of burglary is "trespass with the intent of committing a felony". The "felony" or "attempted felony" is not specified in any way. If the suspect trespasses with the intent of forcing himself on the homeowner (or resident), the suspect has burglarized a residence with sexual motivation. In other words, he burglarized in order to commit a felony, sexual offense.
No, burglary is the crime of "Trespassing with the intent of committing a felony". Trespassing is not a violent act, and the intent to commit a felony is not a violent act. If someone were to be harmed during a break-in, the offender would be charged with other violent crimes, which may include, but are not limited to; battery, assault, and robbery (robbery would replace burglary as a charge).
It is necessary to join intent with an act because there may be no intention to commit a crime and your responsibly will be lessened. If there is intent, but no act, there is no crime.
No necessity can grab the intent to commit a crime.
There is no such thing. Even if the crime was unsuccessful in being carried out, the attempt to commit it satisfies the legal requirement of a criminal act accompanied by a criminal intent.
Anyone with the intent to do so. Most jurisdictions say that someone under the age of 12 cannot form the intent.
Entering upon a property with the intent to commit an unlawful act.