0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Does judges make laws?
Yes, through interpreting and applying legal rules, through interpreting and applying constitutional documents, and through developing common law.
How is responsible for carrying out the law's?
The responsibility for carrying out the law falls on law enforcement agencies, such as police officers, who are tasked with enforcing the laws set by the government. Additionally, the judicial branch of government, including judges and court personnel, plays a role in interpreting and upholding the law through the legal system.
Who give judges authority to make law?
Judges are responsible ONLY for interpreting and then administrating the law. Police are responsible for upholding the law. The Legislative Branch of Government makes law and the Supreme Court makes sure that the laws that have been written are constitutional.
What role do judges play in social control?
Judges play a crucial role in social control by interpreting and applying laws to resolve disputes and ensure justice. Through their decisions, judges set precedents that guide behavior and help maintain order in society. Their role involves balancing individual rights with the need for public safety and order.
What are the differences between the Mexican judiary and the us judiary system?
One key difference is that Mexico has a civil law system, while the US has a common law system. In the Mexican judiciary, judges play a more active role in investigating cases compared to the US system where judges are more neutral arbiters. Additionally, Mexico has a Supreme Court that focuses on constitutional review, while the US Supreme Court has a broader role in interpreting federal laws.
What does the phrase interpreting the law meaning?
Interpreting the law refers to the process of analyzing and applying legal rules to specific cases in order to make decisions or judgments. It involves examining statutory law, case law, legal principles, and legislative intent to determine the meaning and implications of the law in a particular context. Judges, lawyers, and legal scholars engage in interpretation to ensure the just and fair application of the law.
How is the role of a judge different from other elected officials?
Judges' roles are different from elected officials because judges are meant to uphold the law.
How has the court exceeded its role as interpreter of the law and extended its authority into legislation?
Judges are not ignoring laws and introducing their own biases. This process inadvertently allows judges to exceed their authority in the court of law.
What were the Songhai Empires laws based on?
The laws of the Songhai Empire were based on Islamic legal principles, following Sharia law. Islamic judges, known as qadis, were responsible for interpreting and enforcing these laws.
What type of law references formal rules embodied in judicial decisions rendered by courts?
The type of law that references formal rules embodied in judicial decisions rendered by courts is called case law or common law. Case law is derived from the decisions made by judges in previous cases and serves as a precedent for future judicial decisions. It plays a crucial role in shaping and interpreting the law in countries with a common law legal system.
Do you agree judges making law instead of interpreting law?
The applicability of a law is dependent upon an underlying set of facts and circumstances. When you apply a law to a set of facts, you effectively interpret it to be applicable, and if it is applicable to a set of facts and circumstances that haven't been previously tested, then I suppose you're making law -- but it is the same law, just applied to a new set of facts. The big difference of opinion is not whether a law should be made or interpreted as such, but rather what the law is. There is a spectrum of opinion and judges of those courts (appellate courts) that review how laws are applied to facts, have differing opinions. The spectrum ranges from those who believe that if the law does not contain the words specifically applicable to a situation, it should not be applied -- these are the "strict" constructionists. At the "other end" of the spectrum are judges who believe that while there may be no new laws as such, the sources and scope of our body of laws are broader. Either way, judges "make law" by interpreting it as applicable or inapplicable, or if applicable, how it will apply.
What does a roman judge do?
A Roman judge in ancient Rome was responsible for presiding over legal cases, interpreting the law, and handing down judgments. They were tasked with ensuring that trials were conducted fairly, evidence was presented accurately, and justice was served according to Roman law. Roman judges played a crucial role in maintaining order and upholding the legal system of the Roman Empire.
