Undetermined - depends on how long the dictator can maintain his control.
Military Dictatorship
a dictatorship
Well actually to be a good community you need both because think of segregation. If it were civilian rule black people would still be in separate schools and public places than white people. Military rule is bad sometimes because it may turn into a dictatorship
A dictatorship is the type of government that typically remains in control by utilizing the military and the police. A representative democracy is the opposite of a dictatorship.
of course not it was a series of small city states governered by separate entities like Athens by democracy or Sparta by military dictatorship
Military Dictatorship
Military rule is a type of dictatorship in which power is held by one or military
Military Dictatorship
because if we did not then they would be in control of the govt and it would be a dictatorship...
Military dictator of Uganda 1971 to 1979. The country was devastated during his Dictatorship
In a democracy, the people have control of the government; in a Dictatorship, one person has control of the government.A democracy is when the people rule the government and a dictatorship is when one or a small group of people rule the gobernment such as a military leader
that the best form of government was a military Dictatorship.
I would say not really. But the bad democracy can progress where as the military rule will most likely become a terrible dictatorship and the democracy would (obviously) be better. This is my opinion.
Provisional Military Dictatorship of Mughan was created in 1918.
Provisional Military Dictatorship of Mughan ended in 1919.
hoped to create a military Dictatorship
Dictatorship or minority rule