With New Zealand being the result of two tectonic plates meeting, it is plausible that if one of these dropped at all or there was a big enough earthquake a tsunami could reach vast amounts of Australia's east coast
That would depend on where the tsunami struck and how big it was. Much of Australia's coastline is very sparsely populated, but a tsunami hitting one of the coastal towns or cities would wreak havoc.
The likelihood of a tsunami hitting Atlanta in the future is extremely low, as Atlanta is located far inland and not near any major bodies of water where tsunamis typically occur.
No, Sydney was not directly affected by the tsunami that hit Brisbane, Australia. Tsunamis are usually localized events and their impact is limited to specific areas along the coastline where they make landfall.
It's not likely for tsunami's to continue hitting Japan.
Theoretically, a tsunami could hit anywhere along Australia's coastline. The east coast is highly likely due to the position of a major fault line in New Zealand, and the west coast could also be hit because of the potential for seismic activity in the Indian Ocean.
It is possible for a tsunami to hit the coast of Georgia, as the state borders the Atlantic Ocean. However, the likelihood of a tsunami hitting Georgia is relatively low compared to other regions like the Pacific coast due to the low occurrence of large undersea earthquakes in the Atlantic Ocean.
that depends on where the tsunami is hitting the one in December 2004 costed billions
The coastline is sometimes changed by a few miles.
No. West Virginia doesn't have a coastline.
A tsunami can reach heights of over 100 feet when it makes landfall, depending on factors such as the size and strength of the tsunami and the shape of the coastline.
The top of a tsunami wave is called the crest. It represents the highest point of the wave as it approaches the coastline.
If the desert is located along a coastline it might be subject to a tsunami.