it was due to the sepration of the western empire
a succession of weak emperors
Global warming is the main reason for polar bears decline.
This is true that the Mughals were pleasure seeking but this was not the main reason for their decline. The weakening of the army plus the attacks from the Persians are the main reasons for their decline.
the main reason was there loss against chaldeans and medes
There are many reasons the Egyptian empire began to decline. However, the biggest reason was invasion. They were invaded by the Persians around 1200 BC.
Answer 1That was Muhammed.The Caliph Tribe Continued to discover more informationon the umayyad's.Answer 2There is much debate on who started the Umayyad dynasty. Most scholars attribute it to Mu'awiya I, the Muslim Governor of Damascus in 650 C.E. since he was the first to rule as Caliph and claim that his family had the right to rule the Caliphate. (This was opposed to the previously-used system of elections by leading officials.) In accordance with his claim, his son Yazid I succeeded him.The reason Mu'awiya's place as the beginning of the Umayyad Dynasty is twofold. Firstly, the Rightly-Guided Caliph, 'Othman, was part of the Banu Umayya (the family of the Umayyads). This makes Mu'awiya the second Umayyad to be Caliph. Secondly, in order to claim legitimacy, Mu'awiya alleged the Mohammed had chosen his family to be the stewards of the Caliphate, citing several sources. This claim is a minority position today and was contested at the time as well (which is one of the main causes of the Fitna Al-Kubra - the first Islamic Civil War).
Rural decline and immigration into the cities are the main reason; this is because Mexico is in the middle of an industrialization process.
the development of public opinion polls as an alternative means of discovering public sentiment
Increase in specialization ( i bet this is for castle learning)
Answer 1That was Muhammed.The Caliph Tribe Continued to discover more informationon the umayyad's.Answer 2There is much debate on who started the Umayyad dynasty. Most scholars attribute it to Mu'awiya I, the Muslim Governor of Damascus in 650 C.E. since he was the first to rule as Caliph and claim that his family had the right to rule the Caliphate. (This was opposed to the previously-used system of elections by leading officials.) In accordance with his claim, his son Yazid I succeeded him.The reason Mu'awiya's place as the beginning of the Umayyad Dynasty is twofold. Firstly, the Rightly-Guided Caliph, 'Othman, was part of the Banu Umayya (the family of the Umayyads). This makes Mu'awiya the second Umayyad to be Caliph. Secondly, in order to claim legitimacy, Mu'awiya alleged the Mohammed had chosen his family to be the stewards of the Caliphate, citing several sources. This claim is a minority position today and was contested at the time as well (which is one of the main causes of the Fitna Al-Kubra - the first Islamic Civil War).
domestic herds are numerous although wild Yaks are in decline
There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.