density
Direct or inverse relationships,that is a problem
There is some debate among theoretical physicists, about whether matter can exist in zero volume. In a sense, this defies belief, since matter exists in space (and time) and if the volume is zero, there is no space. On the other hand, the mathematical analysis of the gravitational collapse of a star into a black hole suggests that the collapse cannot be stopped, and will continue until volume reaches zero and density reaches infinity, creating an object called a singularity, which is unlike normal matter as we know it. This is a difficult subject to research and it may be a long time before we have a definitive answer. But for now, tentatively, I would have to say that yes, you can have a singularity with zero volume and infinite density, and the substance in the singularity does exist.
Infinity was not created as it does not exist as a discrete number but as a mathematical hypothesis to define chaos by mathematicians in antiquity.
A fraction is a mathematical concept. It need not have any physical existence and so it can exist in a vacuum.
A mathematical equation doesn't exist; in chemical terms:H2O(l)===========> H2O(g)
does exist the code for sgh f210
Pressure is due to the bombardment of molecules on the walls of the container. So when the volume is reduced then naturally the surface area will be reduced. Pressure is the force measured per unit area. Hence reducing volume would bring a decrease in its surface area and so the pressure increases. So volume and pressure are getting related.
Anything that has volume and takes up space in the universe.
exist is = to be excist = nothing
Volume is the space that an object occupies (or that it would occupy if it were to exist in the physical world rather than just as a concept).
What do you mean by a "mathematical sentence"? In some practice in analysis (Calculus stuff), we call a statement a sentence if it looks like one or any combination of the following: "For all a in set A, condition P(a) is true/false" "There exist some (or unique) a in set A where P(a) is true/false" So in that practice, your statement is NOT a sentence, but if you phrase it "There exist a unique x in our set where x = 0 is true" or simply "There exist a unique element x where x = 0" It would be a sentence. BUT, I am pretty sure what I am talking about is not the same "mathematical sentence" as yours.
Although the mathematical facts of the theorem existed - even before humans did - the theorem itself did not exist until Pythagoras thought of it. In that sense, he did not FIND it because it did not exist until he had thought of it.