Want this question answered?
The Inca did not have cannons. Otherwise, they could have defeated the Spanish and stayed independent!
Certainly not more than one hundred with efficacy. There may be an historical account of the the earning of the nickname "Old Ironsides", which would give an estimation of cannons of the 1800s capabilities.
no
8
no. but there could be one in the future
world war 1,2 and on pirate ships! During the American Civil War, cannons were used in many applications. Forts were built to protect the coast and were armed with very large cannons. Ships also carried cannon of large caliber including river boats that could travel the Mississippi and Tennesse Rivers to attack river forts. In the field, smaller cannons were used on carriages. There was also a "mountain howitzer" that could be easily transported by horse. Where were they used? Every battle had cannons. At the Battle of Shiloh in April 1862, the Confederates lined up 66 field guns to fire into the Hornet's Nest---this was the most numerous cannons used in a battle on North America at that time.
8 years
Artillery (Cannons) could collapse them.
It is possible that he could have been a real pirate but there are no records?
Cannons were known simply as cannons and could be made of different metals including bronze or copper. There were also mortars which were wider and shorter barreled than cannons. Both were often used together as mortars traditionally fired at a higher arc than cannons and were more useful at closer targets.
yes the English obviously won because otherwise we would all be spanish. even though the spanish had twice the number of ships, the English ships were small and could move fast. also the English cannons could fire long distaince but the spanish cannons were close range.yes
Six.