Want this question answered?
stalemate
yes
The trench warfare. And the fact that both sides kept constantly sending more and more troops to the western front. So basically they go no where. If they try and advance there are machine guns and other artillary ready.
The Western Front is generally considered a stalemate because of Trench Warfare. The line separating Allied Territory and Entente territory did not move much at all during the whole war. This is because both sides stayed in their trenches and if they advanced, they were pushed back quickly
Both sides were too well matched. Neither side could gain a decisive advantage in gaining a forward thrust deep into enemy territory, without losing any advantage during the next counter-attack, and falling back to where they started from - resulting in stalemate.
stalemate
yes
ugh
The Western Front!
beacuse Winter Had Approached
On the western front, along France's eastern border (it was called the western front because it was on the west of Germany.
The technological innovations led to the trench stalemate on the western front in various ways. Each army developed entrenchments which they intended to use in the war and this is what propagated the Trench Warfare.
The extra manpower brought an end to the stalemate on the Western Front.
four months. ehehe, jokes, idno.
The first large battle of the US Civil War was fought
I think it was the machine guns as they were able to kill hundreds of the other side in minutes.
neither side could decisively beat the other