Appeasement is the most effective response to aggression .
Appeasement is the most effective response to aggression .
Appeasement is the most effective response to aggression .
In the context of World War II, including the years just prior to its outbreak in 1939, the historical record is generally quite clear: the most effective response to the aggression of nations such as Germany and Italy during the 1930s would have been collective security -- galvanized by the will to take military action when necessary. While appeasement proved effective in buying time for Allied preparations for war, it did so at the cost of territorial losses, betrayal of national sovereignty (in the case of Czechoslovakia), and a strengthening of the aggressor-nations.
The response to axis aggression in the 1930s by western democracies was appeasement.
Appeasement
Kill yourself actually that is a good choice
The League of Nations was the precursor to the United Nations. The greatest failing of the League of Nations is its absolute inaction in response to aggression prior to the outbreak of the Second World War.
According to the frustration-aggression principle, the immediate response to frustration is anger. This theory suggests that when individuals are blocked from achieving a goal or desire, they are more likely to feel and express anger as a response.
can you attribute crime to aggression or aggression to crime e.g. which one is a stimulus and is a response
there was three reasons 1- Britain did not want to go to war 2- They were buying time to build their army 3- Some agreed that the treaty of Versailles was harsh
With Germany Roosevelt waited longer to respond while with Japanese he acted much quicker to their aggression. Roosevelt condemned both acts of aggression.
With Germany Roosevelt waited longer to respond while with Japanese he acted much quicker to their aggression. Roosevelt condemned both acts of aggression.