Although many protected works have some kind of esoteric "value" based on how much they've earned in licensing, fees themselves are relatively low compared to fines for not having a license. In fact, that becomes a problem for small companies attempting to license works owned by huge ones: it's not worth Sony's time to talk to Joe Bob's Music Publishing, because that license might only be worth a few hundred bucks. But if Sony ignores Joe Bob and he uses the music anyway, it is worth their time to sue him--they might get up to a quarter of a million dollars.
Most uses require permission from the copyright holder, which can be time-consuming and expensive.
Copyright is an expensive thing I dont think that they can afford F1 copyright so they gave up
A creative work is automatically protected by copyright as soon as it is fixed in a tangible medium. An invention can be patented; it requires a lengthy and expensive application process.
In IT, copyright most often applies to software, which can be protected by both copyright AND patent law. Most software-related copyright issues are addressed in detail in end user licensing agreements.
Everything you write or create automatically has a copyright. However, the terms of service of most forum accounts require that you forfeit your copyright. Furthermore, claiming copyright on a forum post would be fairly pointless, as most copyright claims are only legally actionable if their is proof of commercial damages.
In most countries copyright is free, instantaneous and automatic.
Most websites give the copyright date as the current year.
Show cattle are the most expensive . but in terms of Market Colby Beef are the most expensive.
The most expensive country is Monaco
the most expensive is nuclear energy
It does not cost anything to receive copyright protection in most cases. For a watch, you would need to seek out a patent to protect your product, not copyright.
Most copyright societies have online application forms. There may be a registration fee.