It is a concurring opinion. If there is no disagreement with the basis, the justice is included in the "majority opinion." In some cases, concurring opinions can become plurality decisions.
The Supreme Court must have a simple majority to render a decision in a case.
For a majority ruling on the Supreme Court, a minimum of five out of the nine justices must agree. This is because a majority decision requires more than half of the justices to support a particular outcome or opinion. It is necessary to have a majority in order to establish a binding decision for the Court.
The willingness of the government and the Exutive Branch to enforce that decision.
It requires the vote of at least four of the nine US Supreme Court justices to grant a petition for writ of certiorari. If four Justices agree, the Supreme Court will accept the case. This is referred to as the "Rule of Four."
After all th opinions have been written and finalized, the justices announced their final decisions. The decisions are from the majority vote of the justices
No. The Supreme Court, like all courts, is immune from lawsuits. If they weren't, people would be suing constantly (someone is always unhappy with the outcome of a case), which would interfere with the justices' ability to make an impartial decision. There are enough obstacles standing in the way of impartiality already.
the principle of judicial review was established
Brown v. Board of education
No. The Supreme Court, like all courts, is immune from lawsuits. If they weren't, people would be suing constantly (someone is always unhappy with the outcome of a case), which would interfere with the justices' ability to make an impartial decision. There are enough obstacles standing in the way of impartiality already.
It is impossible to tell the outcome of the decision process without knowing more information. One can assume, however, that the outcome of the decision process is, in fact, a decision.
The justices heard oral arguments on February 27 and February 28, 1963, and rendered their 8-1 decision in favor of Schempp on June 17, 1963.The Supreme Court affirmed the US District Court decision overturning a Pennsylvania statute requiring Bible verses be read at the beginning of each school day.Read more: When_was_Abington_School_District_v._Schempp_heard_in_the_US_Supreme_Court
It is an advantage for a president to appoint Supreme Court justices because they can shape the ideology and direction of the Court for decades to come. Justices serve for life, so a president's appointment can have a lasting impact on the interpretation of the Constitution and the outcome of significant legal cases. This allows a president to leave a lasting legacy on the court's rulings and contribute to their party's stance on key issues.