It does purmanate harm to the animals. It puts them in complete danger. And it is just sad to see them go through that.
There are many side-effects to testing in animals such as permanent brain damage, cancer, and even death.
One argument against is that it involves experimenting with the health and safety of human beings. An argument for is that although effects of drugs on animals may be similar to their effects on humans, some effects may be specific to human beings only. Another is that testing drugs on human beings may result in unexpected negative results for the subjects.
pollution, oil spills, endangered animals, etc
To find out allergic reactions, and possible toxic effects with killing people.
All animals get side effects. Most die or are left severely maimed, and those who do not die are kept in cramped, unsanitary conditions until they do.
The primary negative effects of the Columbian Exchange were death, disease, and slavery. Positive effects included the incorporation of European methods of agriculture, and the introduction to the Americas of animals such as horses.
These animals suffer alot from the side effects caused from the drug. (Poor animals) Some even have effects on them like blindness, deaf, infections of disease etc. EVEN DEATH but a slow painful death.
Negative effects of hurricanes include habitat loss for animals, displaced families, injury and death. Many marine species are adapted to handle the effects of hurricanes.
Often times the animals die. If not, then they suffer deformities, pain, have diseases inflicted on them, lose senses, torture, sickness.
Nuclear weapons testing can have negative impacts on the environment. They can make plants, soil and rain radioactive. This is extremely harmful to humans. Radioactivity can cause mutations in humans and animals.
some animals are burned because of the chemicals, blinded, maimed, and even killed. most are killed after the testing is over anyway. America should really be doing more to protect animals
negative effects