answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

That is not a properly formed Roman Numeral.

It could be intended to be 62 and would more correctly be written as LXII.

Or it may have been supposed to be XIII which would be 13.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the number in roman numerals for xiiL?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp