Electiricity produced by coal burning plants, wind turbines or hydroelectric dams. Nuclear reactors are just one more way of making electrons move (which is what electricity is), and is better for the environmen than burning coal.
The alternatives to nuclear power are solar, wind, petroleum, natural gas, hydrogen and water. But, let's not be too quick to discount nuclear power because we are entering the age of clean nuclear power. I'll explain, at least as much as my limited understanding will allow.
It isn't actually necessary to not use nuclear power. What the world wants to get away from is nuclear power that relies on fission, or breaking apart the atoms, of radioactive/unstable elements such as uranium. Helium-3 is an isotope of helium that is not radioactive/unstable. Researchers at the University of Wisconsin, Fusion Technology institute have succeeded in fusing helium-3 atoms, demonstrating that nuclear power, with no radiation whatsoever is not only possible, but it is ready to be fully developed and used.
Produce electricity, also radioisotopes for medicine and industry
If and when the technology is created, fusion power would be infinitely more beneficial than nuclear power. Fusion would decrease pollution and increase electricity output.
We think that in nuclear bomb there is uv rays and ozone layer emmits it so we think that ozone is opposite of nuclear energy
BY PRIYAM MEHTA(13 YEARS) AND MANANK PATEL (13 YEARS)
I am not sure if there is an opposite of fission, where an atom is split in half, but if there was an opposite it would probably be nuclear fusion, where two nuclei join together giving off energy. Nuclear fusion occurs in space, and it is how the sun gives off its energy.
If it is stored in the nucleus, it must be nuclear energy.
Nuclear power has no dangers. It is the opposite. Nuclear energy is a clean source for power production. It is even cleaner than solar energy. Power generation from nuclear energy is cheaper than that produced from solar, wind, gas, oil, and wind energy sources. Nuclear radiation from nuclear power plants is 100 times less than nuclear radiation from coal fired power plants. Nuclear weapons are of mass destruction nature due to emitted nuclear radiation, heat, and pressure air waves.
Yes, nuclear energy is energy.
Nuclear energy and renewable energy are not related. Renewable energy does not use nuclear energy.
No, the opposite, it releases a lot of energy
I am not sure if there is an opposite of fission, where an atom is split in half, but if there was an opposite it would probably be nuclear fusion, where two nuclei join together giving off energy. Nuclear fusion occurs in space, and it is how the sun gives off its energy.
Nuclear fission is the source of the sun's energy. It is a process in which an atom of hydrogen fuses with another atom of hydrogen, releasing large amounts of energy in the process. It is quite the opposite of nuclear fission, which is the source of atomic energy.
If it is stored in the nucleus, it must be nuclear energy.
Nuclear Fission is the separation of two superheated nuclei of the same atom/ion. It creates a burst of energy which is used to spin turbines for nuclear energy. It is the opposite of nuclear fusion as that fuses the chemicals, this is the separation. So the answer: two atoms, some energy and a LOT of radioactive waste
Nuclear power has no dangers. It is the opposite. Nuclear energy is a clean source for power production. It is even cleaner than solar energy. Power generation from nuclear energy is cheaper than that produced from solar, wind, gas, oil, and wind energy sources. Nuclear radiation from nuclear power plants is 100 times less than nuclear radiation from coal fired power plants. Nuclear weapons are of mass destruction nature due to emitted nuclear radiation, heat, and pressure air waves.
Yes, nuclear energy is energy.
splitting a nucleus into two nuclei
Nuclear energy
Nuclear fusion produces nuclear energy
The energy released is nuclear energy.
Uranium is used as nuclear fuel in nuclear reactors.