answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer
A:The synoptic gospels are Matthew, Mark and Luke. Mark's Gospel was the original synoptic gospel, believed to have been written around 70 CE. Whenever Matthew and Luke copy material from Mark's Gospel, they do so with remarkable consistency, even to the use of words in the original Greek language.

John's Gospel, although influenced by Mark's Gospel, is further removed, with its principal source being Luke's Gospel, although some material was taken direct from Mark.

Much of the material in John is unique to this Gospel, and the direct consistency is quiter low. However, passages in John can be seen to be adaptations of similar material in Luke. For example, the post-resurrection appearance of Jesus, in which he tells the disciples to cast their nets on the other side and thus they catch a multitude of fish, is unique to John, but a very similar episode occurs in Luke before the crucifixion and resurrection.

In the synoptic gospels, particularly in Mark, Jesus is at pains to keep his true identity secret. He does not 'cleanse' the Temple until towards the end of his mission, and this violent action is the trigger for his arrest and trial. In John's Gospel, the cleansing of the Temple occurs at the very beginning of his ministry and Jesus does not try to hide his true identity. In this Gospel, the trigger for his arrest and trial becomes claims that he committed blasphemy. Other timing differences between John and the synoptics include that that the synoptics have Jesus crucified at 9 AM, the third hour on the day after the Passover feast, whereas John has Jesus only sent for crucifixion at midday, the sixth hour, on the day before the Passover feast. Changes such as these are so cosmetically small that most readers do not notice them, but they have a major imact on the Christology of the accounts.

John's Gospel is the first to identify Jesus as truly divine and pre-existing (John 1:1: "In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God."). The last words on the cross had to suit a divine and pre-existing Jesus who always understood his mission on earth and planned his fate, so they could not be the words of a defeated and betrayed man. In John 19:30, Jesus said "It is finished," and gave up the ghost. Compare Mark 15:34, followed by Matthew 27:46, "My God. My God. Why hast thou forsaken me?" or the improved version in Luke 23:46, "Father into thy hands I commend my spirit."

With its author's clever use of changes in timing and the introduction of new themes and other subtle changes in John's Gospel, it is hard to quantify the differences between it and the synoptic gospels on a percentage or proportionate basis.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the percentage difference between the synoptic gospels and John's Gospel?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which gospel was written to inspire faith in Jesus but is not a synoptic gospel?

The gospel of John is not part of the Synoptic Gospels.The gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are referred to as the Synoptic Gospels.


Which one of the gospels is not synoptic?

john


Is the difference between the synoptic Gospels true or false?

The differences are true, because each gospel concentrates on a certain value in the Life of Jesus Christ. But differences does not mean conflicts.


Should the Synoptic Gospels be capitalized?

Yes.


Of the four evanglists which was not part of the synoptic writers?

Saint John (he wrote the gospel of john in the bible) is the evangelist who was not part of the synoptic writers. The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke were known as the synoptic writers because they had many of the same stories in their gospels.


What are the common oral traditions between the synoptic gospels?

A:Common oral traditions would be a useful explanation for what is known as the 'Synoptic Problem', a problem of the surprising similarities among the synoptic gospels, if those traditions exist. However, a parallel reading of the three synoptic gospels, in the original Greek language, shows that when they agree, the similarities are too great and they often use exactly the same words in the Greek language. Clearly, there is a literary dependency among the synoptic gospels, and it can not be explained by oral sources. The explanation for this is that Matthewand Luke were actually based on Mark, but also relied on the hypothetical 'Q' document for further sayings material attributed to Jesus. There is no evidence of common oral traditions.


Did John assume that his readers understood the basic outline of the synoptic Gospels?

A:The author of John's Gospel certainly knew of the existence of Mark and Luke, as his own gospel was loosely based on those gospels (mainly Luke, but some material is from Mark), but like the author of Luke he seems entirely unaware of the existence of Matthew's Gospel. John was written to be the gospel of choice in the Johannine community and the synoptic gospels were probably discouraged. Nevertheless the anonymous author of Johnassumed his readers might have known the synoptic gospels, as evidenced by the fact that even when completely changing the synoptic account, he was careful not to directly contradict his sources.However, there is a difference between possibly knowing of the synoptic gospels and knowing them well enough that John need not tell everything about the life and mission of Jesus. When John omits details found in the synoptic Gospels of Mark and Luke, it was not because the author expected his readers to have found those stories elsewhere, while he focussed on important new information. For example, John omits the nativity story of Luke, but it can be seen elsewhere that the author and his community did not really believe that Jesus was born in Bethlehem.


What difference between John's Gospel and the Synoptic Gospels most interested you and why?

A:An interesting difference between John's Gospel and the synoptic gospels is the timing of the crucifixion of Jesus. In the synoptic gospels, the Last Super celebrated the seder feast and marked the beginning of the Passover; Jesus was placed on the cross at the third hour (9 o'clock) the next morning and remained on the cross for six hours. In John's Gospel, Jesus was placed on the cross at the sixth hour (12 o'clock) on the day before the Passover. This is interesting because John is able to compare Jesus to the lamb that was sacrificed by the Jews on the day before the Passover, and because there is nothing anywhere in John's account that suggests that Jesus suffered - even Jesus' time on the cross is reduced to a symbolic duration.


What are 3 Gospels that are alike?

Matthew, Mark and Luke are referred to as the 'synoptic gospels' in that they tell of similar stories and in similar sequences.


What language does the word synoptic gospels come from?

The term "synoptic gospels" comes from Greek. The word "synoptic" is derived from the Greek words "syn" (together) and "opsis" (seeing), referring to the fact that the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke present a similar view of Jesus' life and teachings.


What do you call the books that talk about the life and deeds of christ?

They're usually referred to as the Gospels. Sometimes, in academia, they're called the "Synoptic Gospels."


When was the book of Matthew mark Luke and john written?

Matthew, Mark, and Luke are called synoptic gospels because they are from the same point of view.John is the four gospel, written to fill in for the others and to help those find Jesus who did not know him in person.