Cyclone Tracydestroyed 9,000 homes out of a city of 12,000 residences. Whilst this figure does not relfect business, commercial and industrial buildings, it is fairly reflective of the fact that about 75% of the buildings were destroyed.
Yes, Cyclone Tracy was a tropical cyclone.
No. Cyclone Tracy was an a very intense but abnormally small cyclone.
Cyclone Selma came before Cyclone Tracy.
Cyclone Tracy itself will never recur. Cyclones cannot regenerate decades after they have dissipated. There is, however, a very high chance that a cyclone of Tracy's magnitude could form in the Arafura Sea and hit Darwin once more. There is far less chance that it would cause the damage that Tracy did, as Darwin was rebuilt to a stronger standard, with its buildings more cyclone-proof.
Cyclone Tracy, in 1974, did not destroy any crops. When the cyclone made landfall, the eye of the cyclone centred over Darwin, so the worst damage was the devastation of houses and other buildings. The area around Darwin was affected to a much more limited sense, and Tracy did not bring heavy rains often associated with cyclones.
- Its a feminine cyclone because its name is TRACY. - Tracy was a girl i knew
Whilst there is a high chance of Darwin being hit by another "Cyclone Tracy", it would not affect the city in the same way. Darwin was rebuilt to be more cyclone-proof, and so fewer buildings would be damaged, and there would probably be fewer deaths.
Cyclone Tracy hit Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Cyclone Tracy started as a tropical storm out in the Arafura Sea.
cyclone Tracy was very serious and was in 1974. it hit on Christmas eve.
The city was literally flattened. Debris lay spread everywhere, powerlines were down and most of the houses and business buildings were reduced to nothing but rubble. For some pictures of Darwin before and after Cyclone Tracy, see the link below.
cyclone Tracy was very dangerous because the winds were very strong