answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

judicial restraint

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the philosophy proposing that judges should strike down the actions of the elected branches only if they clearly violate the literal meaning of the Constitution?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Does the judicial branch have no check on the other branches?

In the US, the US Supreme Court has the final word on whether any actions by the legislative or executive are constitutional. Normally cases on the actions of the latter two branches begin in the lower Federal courts. If the cases are not properly resolved, the US Supreme Court may hear them. Their decisions normally involve laws that have been passed or any executive actions that may have been unconstitutional.


What makes character describe moral philosophy?

character is the result of actions of morality as a result of moral philosophy. character is the history of one's moral philosophy.


Which branch or branches can declare acts or actions to be unconstitutional?

The Judicial branch declares acts or actions to be unconstitutional.


What was Martin Luther King Junior's philosophy and how did this affect his actions?

he was black


What can philosophy do to mankind?

Show truth about man individually and/or collectively, regarding motives, actions, etc. Philosophy offers wisdom and freedom from the known.


The actions of the senate are authorized by who?

The role of the Senate is authorized in Section 3 of Article 1 of the Constitution. Information about the Section 3 of Article 1 of the Constitution is on the website below http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A1Sec3.html


Why do the branches have checks on other branches?

because our gov didnt want one total control branch. so they set up the checks and balances system The framers of the Constitution had an awareness that concentrated that power was dangerous; and expected each branch of government ( Legislative, Executive, Judicial) would try to expand their powers, thus the Consititution it's self would block each other's overly ambitious actions, hence Checks and Balances- where each of the 3 branches have the power to limit the actions of each other. They check and balance each other out.


Luthers Actions Where What?

His original intention was only to reform the Roman Catholic Church, but his actions led to a split of the Church, dividing it into the Protestant and Catholic branches.


Each branch of the U.S. government — the executive, legislative, and judicial branches — has the ability to limit the actions of the other branches?

Which Enlightenment concept does this demonstrate? Checks and balances.


What is the system called in which one branch of govt appoves the actions of other branches?

checks and balances


Whats does separation of power mean in American government?

The principle by which the power of government are divided among separate branches. In the context of the government of the United States of America, according to the Constitution, the three branches of the government - Executive (President) - Legislative (Congress) - Judicial (the Courts) - each have have their own powers. By separating Powers between branches of government you prevent any individual branch from gaining too much power. Each branch has the ability to be a check on the actions of other branches, this is commonly called a system of checks and balances.


What was the significance of the judicial review established by the Supreme Court under John Marshall?

The establishment of judicial review by the Supreme Court under John Marshall was significant because it asserted the court's power to interpret the Constitution and determine the constitutionality of laws. This decision in Marbury v. Madison solidified the court's role as the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution and established the principle of judicial supremacy, giving the court a check on the other branches of government. It greatly expanded the power and influence of the Supreme Court in shaping the interpretation of the Constitution.