Sparta was cool. they killed people. Athens was a bunch of panzies.
While they did kill people, they also were the first direct democracy.
^^ Not entirely helpful, but sadly true.
In Sparta they had what we'd call a Constitutional Monarchy. This means that the King of Sparta would basically be a figure-head for the people to rally around; he didn't have any real power (except in wars I think).
Athens however was the origins of Democracy. In Athens though they practised Direct Democracy, which is the citizens of Athens going and voting on particular issues themselves instead of having MPs, or Senators doing it for them.
In most countries that have a Democracy, there is a Representative Democracy which involves voting a person to represent you in the government/parliament/senate.
So...
Sparta = Constitutional Monarchy
Athens = Direct Democracy
Athens had a democracy where citizens participated in decision-making through voting in the assembly and serving on juries, while Sparta had an oligarchy with two kings and a council of elders called the Gerousia that held significant power. Sparta also had a unique dual system with two kings sharing power.
Sparta and Athens were both city-states in ancient Greece. They were similar in that they had a strong military tradition and valued physical fitness. However, they differed in their government systems (Sparta had an oligarchy while Athens was a democracy), cultural values, and approach to education.
The political system of a country determines how leaders are chosen, laws are made, and power is distributed among government institutions.
A two-party system is a political system where two major parties dominate the political landscape and typically compete for power. In contrast, a multi-party system is a political system where multiple parties compete for power and representation, leading to a more diverse political landscape and potentially requiring coalition governments to govern effectively.
Sparta focused on military training and discipline to improve their city-state. They also implemented a strict social hierarchy and emphasized physical fitness to create a strong and loyal citizenry. Additionally, Sparta established a unique system of government with dual kings and an assembly to make decisions.
Political parties influence the political system by organizing and mobilizing voters, selecting candidates, shaping public policy agendas, and providing a platform for political debate. They also help with fundraising, campaign strategy, and garnering public support for their candidates and policies. In essence, political parties play a central role in shaping the direction and functioning of our political system.
balls
Foreign travelers introduced new philosophies.
If you are talking about Cities States and the Peloponnesian War is mainly because half of the states were in ally with Sparta and the other half were allies with Athens, plus some other neutral states. Sparta and Athens were the two dominant states back then, so when Athens started to gain more and more power, Sparta didn't like that. The possible reason why Sparta and Athens were in dispute all the time might be the governmental system, Sparta had an oligarchic system, and Athens a democratic system. Was like nowadays political parties.
Athens was enemies with Sparta and Sparta was enemies with Athens
Sparta full-time. Athens part-time.
Foreign travelers introduced new philosophies.
No. The modern political system Sparta was closest to is Monarchy.
They both had different political views
Sparta because they did not have as much freedom as Athens.
Athena
Athens had a democracy; Sparta, an oligarchy.
they had different forms of government, Sparta had oligarchy while Athens had democracy. in Athens, you became a man when you turned 18, in Sparta you had to be 30. for money Athens had drachmas and Sparta had obols.