north star
If the radius is larger, the surface will also be larger. As a functional dependency, you only need one - the radius, or the surface - whatever.
Saturn has the largest radius followed by Jupiter.The Equatorial radius of Saturn (not the rings) is about 60,268 kmThe Equatorial radius of Jupiter (not his rings) is about 71,492 kmso Jupiter is larger
Neutrons star is the same size of a city. This is 10 km radius.
The star that is hotter will have a higher luminosity.
You can use kilometers. Or you can compare it to the radius of our Sun, and say, for example, "This star has 600 times the diameter [or radius] of our Sun."
That's the approximate radius of a neutron star, a.k.a. a pulsar.
the distances of the merak star
north star
Rigel has a radius of about 78 solar radii or 0.363 AU.
The bigger the star's radius, the greater its surface area which emits the light. The bigger the temperature, the more luminous is the light the star is emitting.
It's (4 pi) times (the star's radius)2.
It has a radius of between 0.15 and 0.20 that of our Sun. The Sun has a radius of about 696,000 km, so Barnard's Star has a radius of between 104,400 km and 139,200. Average about 121,800 km
Alnitak is a multiple star: Alnitak Aa has a radius which is 20 time the sun's radius.
Its radius is estimated to be about 300 times the radius of the Sun.
A red giant can have a radius of 50 million to 500 million kilometres.
A star's radius is the distance from it centre to its visible surface. The bigger the star, the larger the radius. The radius is not the best means of comparing stars, it is perhaps better to compare stars by their mass.