can pass or veto bills which can be overriden, can make executive orders
After a bill has passed Congress it goes to the President of the United States for review. If the President agrees with the bill, he will sign it into law. If he does not he will veto it and send it back to Congress. Then Congress must have a vote to override the veto and get a 2/3 majority in both houses to override it.
There are two other options that the President has, If Congress is in session and the President takes no action within 10 days, the bill becomes law. If Congress adjourns before 10 days are up and the President takes no action, then the bill dies and Congress may not vote to override. This is called a pocket veto, and if Congress still wants to pass the legislation, they have to start the process all over again..
He can veto bills and can issue an executive order.
The president determines whether to sign or veto bills passed by Congress.
The president determines whether to sign or veto bills passed by Congress. -Apex
The president determines whether to sign or veto bills passed by Congress.
The president determines whether to sign or veto bills passed by Congress.
Constitutionally speaking the US President plays no role in the legislative process other than what influence he may exert on certain legislation by virtue of being the leader of his political party. Only when a bill is passed by Congress an is sent to his desk for signature into law, does the President affect any law.
legislative
vetoing a law that expands federal spending
Legislative leader (apex)
The President, head of the Executive Branch of US government, nominates judges to federal courts. They must be approved by a simple majority vote of the Senate before they are appointed."Recommend" is really the wrong word for the President's role in the judicial appointment process. Members of the Legislative and Judicial branches can recommend (or suggest) a candidate to the President, but only the President has the power to nominate (name the official candidate).
No. I can see no reason for the vice-president to be given any more legislative power or add any unnecessary complications to the legislative process.
the president both symbolizes and rules government