VL is not a valid roman numeral.
Someone may have been trying to use a shortcut to write 45, which is supposed to be XLV, or the sequence in question may not have been intended as a roman numeral at all.
VL is not a valid Roman numeral.
The Roman numeral MMMXL represents the number 3040.
Vl
VL = 45 but in today's notation it is written out as XLV
XCII because XC = 90 (10 less than 100) + II (1 + 1)
Vl
45
The Romans themselves would have probably notated 45 as VL but the rules governing today's Roman numeral system, which were introduced during the Middle Ages, gives 45 as XLV in Roman numerals.
45 but under today's notation of Roman numerals it is written out as XLV
98
In ancient Rome the numerals of VL would have been perfectly acceptable as being the equivalent of 45. But the real rules governing the original Roman numeral system were changed during the Middle Ages and as a result the equivalent of 45 in Roman numerals today is considered to be XLV.
June 26 = 06/26 = VI / XXVI