Cracked egg theory?? Please explain.
When the theory of plate tectonics was first published in the early 1900s, it was dismissed by main stream scientists as being ridiculous - because many if not most of those scientists believed in the "steady state" of the Earth theory - things don't change or change very little. Today, the theory of plate tectonics has been supported by scientific study and discovery, beginning in the 1950s - and the vast majority of scientists today believe in it.
A scientific theory is something that is tried and tested, and not yet disproven. It is close to being scientific 'fact' as you can get. Not all hypotheses will become theories because sometimes they get disproven. That means the hypothesis will need to be changed and tested again.
The earth is about 4.54 billion years old. This is not a theory but is a scientific fact. The science behind this fact is not that difficult to understand. Estimates on the age of the earth come from the radiometric dating of materials (rocks) to discover the amount of radioactive decay that has occurred since the materials being "metered" were sequestered inside the rock. See the related question on uranium-lead dating. It is fairly easy to read and makes it easy to "connect the dots" and get an understanding of the ideas. The most recent data indicates an age of 4.567 billion years.
The plate tectonic theory states that new Earth crust is being formed while old crust descends back into the mantle. Uneven heating in the mantle causes convection which keeps the crust in motion. The constant movement of Earth's plates are the result of the three types of boundaries, divergent, convergent, and transform, and the convection in the mantle.
A supernova while the Earth was being created.
Proof of it being wrong or another improved and better theory.
By being tested against reality multiple times.
By being tested against reality multiple times.
A scientific theory is a theory, no given proof of being a fact, a scientific law is what always happens, essentially a fact. Both is in chemistry and physics. The theory of gravitation happens before it became the Law of gravitation. Scientific theories and laws are similar except laws were proven to be recognize as a fact.
No. A theory cannot be disproven. This is a corollary of the fact that a theory cannot be proven either; otherwise it would be a theorem.The correct term for a theory being consistent with evidence and reliable in predictions is validated. The correct term for not being validated, or an overturning of validation, is invalidated.
A scientific theory is the way scientists attempt to explain what they observe through experiments. When a theory has been made it can be changed if experiments alter the understanding of the event that is being observed.
According to scientific theory, humans evolved over millions of years from earlier primates through the process of natural selection. This evolution occurred on Earth, with humans being a product of biological and environmental factors.
Yes. Scientific theories, hypotheses or more generally conjectures must be testable capable of being proved false.
The heliocentric theory questioned the existing belief in the geocentric theory of astronomy. Aside from being an astronomical observation, the heliocentric theory helped people to realize that they are not necessarily the center of the universe, which is an important part of scientific objectivity.
A theory that has been tested, verified and universally accepted as being true can be called a law.
First off that's not a word, and any scientific theory can be debunked if a better theory replaces it or the evidence begins to point in a different direction thus debasing the previous theory.
Nearly 100%. Someone who claims something is "just a theory" has already proven they lack an understanding of scientific definitions. This usually means they lack an understanding of the subject which they refered to as just a theory.