When the theory of plate tectonics was first published in the early 1900s, it was dismissed by main stream scientists as being ridiculous - because many if not most of those scientists believed in the "steady state" of the Earth theory - things don't change or change very little.
Today, the theory of plate tectonics has been supported by scientific study and discovery, beginning in the 1950s - and the vast majority of scientists today believe in it.
Despite what Creationist would have you believe (when debating other topics) theory does not mean hypothesis or speculation. In science, a theory is an explanation of the natural world that is well-substantiated by evidence. This includes a number of explanations that are so well-substantiated by evidence that there is virtually no doubt among scientists that it is the correct explanation. These include the theory of plate tectonics, the thoery of evolution, atomic theory, and germ theory.
Some notable handicapped scientists include Stephen Hawking, who had ALS, Temple Grandin, who has autism, and John Nash, who had schizophrenia. These scientists made significant contributions to their respective fields despite their disabilities.
Alfred Wegener proposed the theory of continental drift in the early 20th century, suggesting that continents were once joined together and have since drifted apart. He provided evidence through geological and fossil similarities across continents, as well as matching coastlines and rock formations. Despite facing initial skepticism, his work laid the foundation for the modern theory of plate tectonics.
Alfred Wegener proposed the theory of continental drift, suggesting that all continents were once connected in a single supercontinent called Pangaea. Wegener supported his theory with evidence from fossil, rock, and climate data, despite facing significant skepticism from the scientific community during his time. His ideas laid the foundation for the development of the modern theory of plate tectonics.
Alfred Wegener proposed the continental drift hypothesis in 1912, suggesting that continents were once connected in a supercontinent called Pangaea and drifted to their current positions. Despite facing skepticism initially, his ideas laid the foundation for the theory of plate tectonics, which explains the movement of Earth's lithosphere.
"Despite the evidence presented, the facts are irrelevant in this case!"
Bob Ewell lies on the stand during Tom Robinson's trial in "To Kill a Mockingbird" when he accuses Tom of assaulting his daughter Mayella, despite the evidence showing otherwise.
Despite what Creationist would have you believe (when debating other topics) theory does not mean hypothesis or speculation. In science, a theory is an explanation of the natural world that is well-substantiated by evidence. This includes a number of explanations that are so well-substantiated by evidence that there is virtually no doubt among scientists that it is the correct explanation. These include the theory of plate tectonics, the thoery of evolution, atomic theory, and germ theory.
Alfred Wegener used several pieces of evidence to support his theory of continental drift, including the fit of continents like South America and Africa, similarities in rock formations and fossils across continents, and the matching of ancient climate indicators like glaciation patterns. Despite facing initial skepticism, Wegener's evidence paved the way for the development of the theory of plate tectonics.
Delusion
No, Tupac Shakur, also known as 2Pac, passed away on September 13, 1996. Despite numerous conspiracy theories suggesting otherwise, there is no credible evidence to support the claim that he is still alive.
The police arrested suspects, but they did not have any hard evidence.
Scientists may refer to similar structures as homologous structures, which are anatomical features that have a common evolutionary origin, despite potentially serving different functions in different species. These structures can provide evidence of a shared ancestry between different organisms.
The vast majority of scientists say that creation, as opposed to current biological, physical, chemical and astronomical models, is pseudoscience with a religious and political agenda.When we say "majority", we don't just mean 101 to 100. We're talking 999 out of every 1000. Some creation supporters have compiled lists of a few hundred "scientists" which support it. Most of these "scientists" are unqualified; most of the remainder have very little actual qualification. Of the few others, their opinion is based on religious (and not purely scientific) grounds.There are hundreds of thousands of scientists who would attest that their work and research indicates current science to be correct, and creationist claims to the contrary are unfounded, based in misapplication, misunderstanding, and speculation about facts.Quite simply, scientists (as a group) say that creationism is wrong/false/incorrect/fake.ANSWERYou will find that anti-creation scientists are over-represented in the field of Biology despite overwhelming modern evidence and research otherwise by other scientists in other fields such as ENTROPY. [Not old parroted "facts" and opinions passed off as facts but since discredited].Anyway, most scientists couldn't care less - it's just the squeaking wheel that gets the most grease.
As of now, there is no conclusive evidence of extraterrestrial life. Scientists continue to search for signs of life beyond Earth through various methods such as studying exoplanets and listening for radio signals from space. Despite the vastness of the universe, the search for extraterrestrial life remains ongoing.
Some notable handicapped scientists include Stephen Hawking, who had ALS, Temple Grandin, who has autism, and John Nash, who had schizophrenia. These scientists made significant contributions to their respective fields despite their disabilities.
delusion