Alfred Wegener used several pieces of evidence to support his theory of continental drift, including the fit of continents like South America and Africa, similarities in rock formations and fossils across continents, and the matching of ancient climate indicators like glaciation patterns. Despite facing initial skepticism, Wegener's evidence paved the way for the development of the theory of plate tectonics.
They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.
The ratio of the price of tea in China to the average density of the Moon. Among other things. You might want to be more specific in questions like this.
Other scientists did not believe Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift in the early 20th century because he did not provide a plausible mechanism for how continents could move through the oceanic crust. Additionally, Wegener's evidence supporting his idea was largely based on geological and fossil similarities between continents, which were not considered strong enough to support such a revolutionary idea at the time. It wasn't until the mid-20th century, with the development of the theory of plate tectonics, that Wegener's hypothesis gained widespread acceptance.
It is difficult to prove the nebular hypothesis because the formation of solar systems happens over billions of years, making direct observation of the process challenging. Additionally, there is the lack of direct evidence from other forming solar systems to compare with our own. The hypothesis relies on simulations, models, and indirect observations to support its validity.
The hypothesis of continental drift suggests that continents were once joined together in a single landmass called Pangaea and have since drifted apart to their current positions. This theory was proposed by Alfred Wegener in the early 20th century and is supported by evidence such as matching geological formations, fossils, and the fit of continental coastlines.
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
Fossils, rock layers, and mountain ranges were some of the land features that provided evidence for Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift.
All of the continents fit together like a puzzle.
human remains
Major rivers on different continents match
Alfred Wegener's theory was rejected because he could not prove how the continents actually moved. He showed evidence of fossils from Africa and South America, but still coul not prove the convection surrents going on underground. Other geologists did not believe in his theory just because he was a meteorologist, not a geologist like themselves.
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
It is any trace of an ancient organism that has been preserved in rock.Fossils provided evidence for continental drift by Wegener's hypothesis. Wegener studied land features, fossils, and evidence of climate change.
It was Alfred Wegener but other scientists did not believe him but he found evidence
It is impossible to prove a hypothesis true because science aims to falsify hypotheses rather than prove them true. A hypothesis can only be supported by evidence, but it can never be proven definitively true because new evidence could potentially challenge or change our interpretation of it.
Alfred Wegener's proclamation of continental drift was initially considered a hypothesis because it lacked substantial empirical evidence to fully support it. A theory requires a well-established body of evidence and confirmed predictions, which were not present at the time of Wegener's proposal.
To provide Evidence.