answersLogoWhite

0

Alfred Wegener used several pieces of evidence to support his theory of continental drift, including the fit of continents like South America and Africa, similarities in rock formations and fossils across continents, and the matching of ancient climate indicators like glaciation patterns. Despite facing initial skepticism, Wegener's evidence paved the way for the development of the theory of plate tectonics.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Astronomy

What were the three pieces of evidence offered by Wegener to prove his hypothesis?

Alfred Wegener proposed three main pieces of evidence for his hypothesis of continental drift. First, he noted the jigsaw-like fit of continents, particularly South America and Africa, suggesting they were once joined. Second, he identified similar geological formations and fossil remains across widely separated continents, indicating they were once connected. Lastly, he pointed to paleoclimatic evidence, such as glacial deposits in now tropical regions, which suggested that continents had shifted over time to their current locations.


Why did most scientists reject Wegner theory for nearly a half century?

They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.


What was NOT used by Wegener to support his hypothesis of continental drift?

The ratio of the price of tea in China to the average density of the Moon. Among other things. You might want to be more specific in questions like this.


Why did other scientist not believe Alfred Wegener hypothesis?

Other scientists did not believe Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift in the early 20th century because he did not provide a plausible mechanism for how continents could move through the oceanic crust. Additionally, Wegener's evidence supporting his idea was largely based on geological and fossil similarities between continents, which were not considered strong enough to support such a revolutionary idea at the time. It wasn't until the mid-20th century, with the development of the theory of plate tectonics, that Wegener's hypothesis gained widespread acceptance.


Why is it hard to prove the nebular hypothesis?

It is difficult to prove the nebular hypothesis because the formation of solar systems happens over billions of years, making direct observation of the process challenging. Additionally, there is the lack of direct evidence from other forming solar systems to compare with our own. The hypothesis relies on simulations, models, and indirect observations to support its validity.

Related Questions

Which type of evidence was not used by Alfred wegener to support his continental hypothesis?

Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains


What words Describe the land features that provided evidence for Wegener's hypothesis?

Fossils, rock layers, and mountain ranges were some of the land features that provided evidence for Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift.


What evidence supports wegener's hypothesis?

All of the continents fit together like a puzzle.


Why was Alfres Wegener's hypothesis rejected?

Alfred Wegener's theory was rejected because he could not prove how the continents actually moved. He showed evidence of fossils from Africa and South America, but still coul not prove the convection surrents going on underground. Other geologists did not believe in his theory just because he was a meteorologist, not a geologist like themselves.


What types of evidence was used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis?

human remains


One kind of evidence that supports wegener's hypothesis is that?

Major rivers on different continents match


Which type of evidence was not used by Alfred wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis?

Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains


How did fossil provide evidence for Continental drift?

It is any trace of an ancient organism that has been preserved in rock.Fossils provided evidence for continental drift by Wegener's hypothesis. Wegener studied land features, fossils, and evidence of climate change.


Who was the person that that made a hypothesis of continental drift?

It was Alfred Wegener but other scientists did not believe him but he found evidence


Why do you think wegener held to his hypothesis even though he could not prove it?

Wegener held to his hypothesis of continental drift because he believed the evidence he had gathered—such as the matching geological features, fossil distributions, and the fit of continental coastlines—strongly suggested a historical connection between continents. His conviction was further fueled by the lack of an alternative explanation that could adequately account for these observations. Additionally, Wegener was ahead of his time, and he recognized that scientific understanding evolves; he trusted that future research would eventually provide the necessary evidence to support his ideas.


Why was Alfred Wegener's proclamation known as a hypothesis and not a theory?

Alfred Wegener's proclamation of continental drift was initially considered a hypothesis because it lacked substantial empirical evidence to fully support it. A theory requires a well-established body of evidence and confirmed predictions, which were not present at the time of Wegener's proposal.


Why is it impossible to prove your hypothesis true?

It is impossible to prove a hypothesis true because science aims to falsify hypotheses rather than prove them true. A hypothesis can only be supported by evidence, but it can never be proven definitively true because new evidence could potentially challenge or change our interpretation of it.