Your question betrays a common misconception about the Big Bang, not helped by sloppy explanations by scientists and by popular media presentations.
The BB was NOT an explosion of matter into empty space, expanding outward from a point. It was, instead, and expansion of space itself, with matter coming along for the "ride." Our galaxy is NOT moving "away" from anything, it's not really moving very much at all -- it's just that the space between the Milky Way and all other galaxies is expanding.
Because the BB was an expansion of all space, everywhere, it occurred everywhere. There is no place in our Universe that we can point to and say, "From that place the BB started." If this were not the case, the cosmic microwave background radiation would have a preferred direction -- instead, it's isotropic to one part in 10,000 . In other words, no point in the sky has more than .01% greater intensity of CMBR than any other point.
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
Right after the big bang happened, the universe was expanding at a speed of light. While it was expanding, it started to cool itself down since the big bang caused the universe to heat up to ridiculous temperature.
The person who discovered the galaxies are rushing away from one another and the universe is expanding from an original big bang was Edwin Hubble.
According to the believes of physics and the big bang, we know that the big bang was both big and a bang. Since we are still receiving radiation from the big bang, So considering that factor I would say that it was big and a bang. What do you believe?
Edwin Hubble played a crucial role in providing evidence for the Big Bang Theory by observing the redshift of galaxies. He discovered that galaxies were moving away from each other, and the farther away they were, the faster they were moving. Hubble's observations supported the idea that the universe is expanding, which is a key component of the Big Bang Theory.
Big Bang
the big bang
The Big Bang made the Milky Way galaxy.
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
Galaxies Move away from the area of the big bang with time at speeds higher than that of light.
The person who discovered the existence of galaxies outside of the milky way was Edwin Hubble. He also discovered that galaxies move away from each other with a constant acceleration, leading to the big bang theory.
The person who discovered the existence of galaxies outside of the milky way was Edwin Hubble. He also discovered that galaxies move away from each other with a constant acceleration, leading to the big bang theory.
The big bang was a massive explosion caused by particles travelling at very high speed.
The question is wrong in two ways:The Big Bang is not an explosion. It is an expansion of space.Matter has never been moving away from the Big Bang. The space between stars and galaxies is expanding.
Most of them. except for Andromeda galaxy which is coming towards us - our Milky Way galaxy and they both will collide in 3-4 billion years(Repetition of ''Big Bang'')
God's sperm doesn't have a color exactly... it's probably milky and white
universe started moving away