After a verdict has been rendered in the case, no. It is called double jeapordy, and is prohibited (in the US).
DOUBLE JEAPORDY
That is double jeopardy.
In the Middle Ages, priests were not tried for crimes in secular courts unless they had committed such a crime as treason. For most felonies or misdemeanors, they were tried in ecclesiastical courts, which had rather different standards than secular courts. Punishments for priests found guilty of crimes usually included the guilty being defrocked, but could also include some sort of penance, such as service on the crusades or in a monastery. There was some question as to whether a priest who was defrocked could subsequently be tried for the same crime in secular court. If he was, then he would get the same punishment as anyone else.
Barely any crime because nobody wanted their arms cut off but their was still some crime
He was a lawyer(sp?) after trying other jobs that didn't suit him. He tried to open a shop twice but failed both times, and worked at his father-in-law's tavern for some time. he also tried to become a planter, but his house caught fire and ended that career. none of these are in order though. :P
In some countries torture is still used
Crime is the breaking of a rule or law for which a punishment may ultimately be prescribed by some organized form of government. Crime's severity is measured by the laws or rules it is comitted under.
double jeopardy. Double Jepordy But it's very different in America, meaning you cannot be tried for the EXACT crime twice, but in Australia if you are tried and found innocent, you cannot be tried Guilty for the same crime.... That and Double Jeopardy is a movie =)
you do not have to implicate your self or be your own witness. There are legal rights to protcet individuals.
In the Middle Ages, priests were not tried for crimes in secular courts unless they had committed such a crime as treason. For most felonies or misdemeanors, they were tried in ecclesiastical courts, which had rather different standards than secular courts. Punishments for priests found guilty of crimes usually included the guilty being defrocked, but could also include some sort of penance, such as service on the crusades or in a monastery. There was some question as to whether a priest who was defrocked could subsequently be tried for the same crime in secular court. If he was, then he would get the same punishment as anyone else.
If you are on probation for a felony and commit the same crime it is a felony. If you are on probation for a misdemeanor and commit the same crime it usually will be a misdemeanor. The exception is in some States a third misdemeanor offense for the same crime can be prosecuted as a felony. For example Stealing 3rd Offense or third offense for driving while revoked. This differs from state to state.
The penalty for horse theft in the US can vary from county to county, but in most places it carries the same sentencing as Grand Theft. In some places it is still legal for a horse thief to be tried by a court and hanged for the crime.
In the civilized world, no it is not, not even in places where it is not legal. There are some countries, mostly in Africa and in the Middle East, where it is actually a crime to participate in or attempt a same-sex marriage.
I personally don't think one can stop being a womanizer. I have tried and tried but as much as I try and put an effort I can't seem to stop. Woman are all I think about. I love sex. Who doesn't though some guys and girls aren't the same. Some like sex once a week. Some once or twice a week or every other week. Some even like it 3 times a month so not everyone is the same. I like it a lot. Therefor I have it 3-4 times a day.
In the state of North Carolina an adult age in courts is 16, so if a 16 yr old commits a crime he/she will be tried in adult court. 14 year olds can also be tried in adult court if he/she commits a major felony. Say a 14 year old shoots his mom, he would be tried in adult court. Say a 14 yr old steals from a store, or some small crime, he will not be tried in adult court.
The big assumption in this case (Kansas v. Hendricks) is that there is some distinction between civil commitment and criminal imprisonment. If the Court said that involuntary commitment was criminal in nature, it would have violated the Double Jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment (because Hendricks had already been tried and convicted of his crime). However, because the Court characterized the commitment as "civil" in nature, it was able to avoid the Double Jeopardy clause altogether (because it only applies to being tried twice for the same criminal charge).
The appropriate age to be tried as an adult varies by jurisdiction, but typically ranges from 18 to 21 years old. This age is determined based on factors such as cognitive development and legal responsibilities.
Because you are being charged with a violation of yourstate's laws not some other state's laws, and you are being tried by a "jury of your peers."
Youthful offenders who are under the age of 17 when they commit a crime, come under the jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court system. If a crime is committed after the age of 17, the offender will be considered an adult offender. Depending on the severity of the crime, some under the age of 17, may be tried as an adult.