These countries could be called Serfdoms, Third-world countries, states, territories, Provinces, or Lands.
Puppet state or satellite state.
satellite
mimicry
mimicry
suck mj
Imperialism
imperalism
The Iron Curtain Nations.
Colonialism is the exploitation by a stronger nation towards a weaker nation. The use of the weaker nation's resources is to strengthen and enrich the stronger nation. Colonizing nations generally dominate the resources, labor and markets of the colonial territory. Colonialism is essentially a system of direct political, economic and cultural intervention by a powerful country in a weaker one. Neocolonialism on the other hand is a term used by post-colonial critics of developed countries' involvement in the developing world. Critics of neocolonialism state that private, foreign business companies continue to exploit the resources of the states that were once colonized by an outside country.
Because LEDCs are generally weaker than MEDCS so in a general term we are to see the weak rise compared to the strong, cause you cannot get stronger.
Imperialism began the first time one nation in history took advantage of a weaker one. So although the term was used allot in the 18th and 19th centuries, it was just another word for aggression against a weaker foe. At times simply establishing a sphere of influence over a particular area in the world by a stronger nation may not require armed force, but by economic force or the threat of military force. In certain situations of course, imperialism used to control a weaker nation might be necessary to protect the stronger nation's interests or the interests of an allied nation. So, not all imperialism in its truest form, can be said to be always wrong. In the 21st century three huge examples of what can be called imperialism can be explained. Here is a summary of ones that come to mind: * During the presidential term Of US President George Bush Sr. Iraq invaded a weaker bordering nation, Kuwait. By its purest definition, this can be called imperialism; * After the US 9/11 crisis, The United States and its ally, the United Kingdom, conducted a war against a weaker nation, Iraq. Whether this war was "right or wrong", it was a clear example of powerful nations taking advantage of a clearly weaker one, Iraq; and * Currently, the Russian Federation has invaded the part of Ukraine called the Crimean peninsula. Ukraine was weaker than the Russians forces, and by definition, Russia committed an imperialist action against a weaker nation.
Imperialism began the first time one nation in history took advantage of a weaker one. So although the term was used allot in the 18th and 19th centuries, it was just another word for aggression against a weaker foe. At times simply establishing a sphere of influence over a particular area in the world by a stronger nation may not require armed force, but by economic force or the threat of military force. In certain situations of course, imperialism used to control a weaker nation might be necessary to protect the stronger nation's interests or the interests of an allied nation. So, not all imperialism in its truest form, can be said to be always wrong. In the 21st century three huge examples of what can be called imperialism can be explained. Here is a summary of ones that come to mind: * During the presidential term Of US President George Bush Sr. Iraq invaded a weaker bordering nation, Kuwait. By its purest definition, this can be called imperialism; * After the US 9/11 crisis, The United States and its ally, the United Kingdom, conducted a war against a weaker nation, Iraq. Whether this war was "right or wrong", it was a clear example of powerful nations taking advantage of a clearly weaker one, Iraq; and * Currently, the Russian Federation has invaded the part of Ukraine called the Crimean peninsula. Ukraine was weaker than the Russians forces, and by definition, Russia committed an imperialist action against a weaker nation.
This is equivocation between the word "stronger" in terms of "more adaptable to the environment" and "stronger" as in "has more physical force". A physically weaker lion may be able to endure a harsh drought more effectively than a physically stronger lion, so natural selection would select for the weaker lion because it will have children. Additionally, natural selection and evolution are the same thing. Evolution is the long-term change in populations driven by natural selection on individual organisms.
weaker sex is usually referred to women cos this is the MEN'S WORLD. but considering facts, men r WEAKER than WOMEN...