Winner-takes-all applies to all but 2 states currently members of the United States of America. Winner-takes-all refers to the representation of the state in the electoral college. Where it applies, the party candidates (more specifically their delegates) take up all seats in the electoral college of the state.
If 50.1 peolple of one state vote Democratic, the Democratic delegates receive all seats in the electoral college of this state.
If winner-takes-all does not apply to the state, there are other rules governing the allocation of seats, such as proprotional allocation or district-based allocation.
The District of Columbia and 48 U.S. states (all except Maine and Nebraska) utilize a winner-takes-all rule for the Electoral College. In a winner-take-all state, all of the state's Electoral votes go to whichever candidate receives a majority of the popular vote, or a plurality of the popular vote (less than 50 percent but more than any other candidate).
Electoral college
The Electoral College System
the Electoral College
Yes.
Pennsylvania casts its electoral votes in the U.S. Electoral College on a winner-take-all basis. The winner of the popular election in Pennsylvania gets all of Pennsylvania's electoral votes.
Texas casts its electoral votes in the U.S. Electoral College on a winner-take-all basis. The winner of the presidential election on Election Day in Texas gets all of Texas' electoral votes.
Indiana casts its electoral votes in the U.S. Electoral College on a winner-take-all basis. The winner of the presidential election on Election Day in Indiana gets all of Indiana's electoral votes.
McCain will receive all 34 Electoral College Votes. Texas is a winner take all State.
No city in Pennsylvania gets electoral votes. Based on the 2010 Census, Pennsylvania has 20 electoral votes. Pennsylvania casts all of its electoral votes in the U.S. Electoral College on a winner-take-all basis. The winner of the popular election in Pennsylvania gets all of Pennsylvania's electoral votes.
It's a "winner-take-all" system, so the margin of victory doesn't matter. The winner receives all of the state's electoral votes.
I would not call it a problem, but one feature of the system is its winner-take-all aspect in the awarding of electoral votes. States can split their votes but only a few states choose to do so. There are also people who think it would be better to base the election solely on the popular votes and dispense with the electoral college altogether. However, there are good reasons why the electoral college was established by the Constitution and many new problems that would likely arise with a direct election.
Suppose a candidate, running for a office, wins %1% of the votes in California and another candidate wins 49%. The Winner - Take all system allows for the 1st candidate to receive all the votes in California, to represent the will of the majority of the people