answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

the torts that the plaintiff does not need to prove actual damage

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is torts actionable per se?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Can you sue your wife for kicking you out with no place to go while married?

No. Marital and domestic arrangements are not actionable under contract or torts law. You can of course seek a divorce, with rights to property.


When was Per Se - restaurant - created?

Per Se - restaurant - was created in 2004.


What has the author John G Fleming written?

John G. Fleming has written: 'Supplement to The Law of Torts' -- subject(s): Torts 'Fleming's the law of torts' -- subject(s): Torts 'An Introduction to the Law of Torts (Clarendon Law)' 'An introduction to the law of torts' -- subject(s): Torts 'The solicitor and the disappointed beneficiary'


What was Demeter daughter's name?

Persephone Pronunciation (PER- SE - PHUH - NY) NOT (PER - SE - PHONE)


What is per se?

Per se is a Latin phrase that means in itself. It means by, for, of, or in itself or themselves; intrinsically.


Can you make a sentence using per se?

The questioner is not interested in the answer per se but in completing his homework assignment.


Are there torts that are neither intentional nor negligent?

No, there can't be torts that are not negligent or intentional because then they are not torts. They are called accidents.


What has the author John Lewthwaite written?

John Lewthwaite has written: 'Law of torts' -- subject(s): Cases, Torts 'Law of torts : learning text' -- subject(s): Torts


What is the principal difference between intentional torts and torts of negligence?

For intentional torts you must prove that the tortfeasor meant to carry out the action that resulted in the tort, this is not so for torts of negligence.


What is actionable claim?

'Actionable claims' are claims, which can be enforced only by an action or suit, e.g., debt.


Is actionable civilly a correct statement?

It would be more effective to say actionable in civil court.


What is the meaning of actionable per se?

Generally, it means that a plaintiff does not have to show actual damages before having a viable lawsuit. For example, in slander and libel law, before a slander suit can win damages there must be proof that the person slandered suffered some type of harm like loss of prestige in the community or loss of business. However, some slanders, like saying a particular person is a convicted criminal, are actionable per se, meaning that the plainitff does not have to prove loss of prestige in the community. The law presumes that a false statement that some person is a criminal necessarilly causes damage. A jury would be permitted to award damages without the plaintiff proving that any were actually suffered.