the answer is always B.
It depends on the context.The Conservation of Energy is a physical law.Conserving energy is an act we perform to save money and help the environment.
Is it true that the law of conservation of engery states that momentum is in a collision
Energy can neither be created nor destroyed, but it can be made to change forms.
The Conservation of Matter and the Conservation of Momentum are the consequence of the Conservation of Energy.
I am not sure how much of a proof this is; but light energy is involved both in conservation of energy, and in conservation of momentum. A photon has both energy and momentum.I am not sure how much of a proof this is; but light energy is involved both in conservation of energy, and in conservation of momentum. A photon has both energy and momentum.I am not sure how much of a proof this is; but light energy is involved both in conservation of energy, and in conservation of momentum. A photon has both energy and momentum.I am not sure how much of a proof this is; but light energy is involved both in conservation of energy, and in conservation of momentum. A photon has both energy and momentum.
true
Is it true that the law of conservation of engery states that momentum is in a collision
It depends on the context.The Conservation of Energy is a physical law.Conserving energy is an act we perform to save money and help the environment.
Is it true that the law of conservation of engery states that momentum is in a collision
There is no one "law of conservation", there are several laws, such as conservation of energy, conservation of mass, conservation of electric charge, conservation of rotational momentum, etc.What is always true is that there is SOME quantity that doesn't change in the case of a closed system.
Energy can neither be created nor destroyed, but it can be made to change forms.
The Conservation of Matter and the Conservation of Momentum are the consequence of the Conservation of Energy.
For most situations, that would be true, and this limitation is described as the law of conservation of energy. However we also know that mass and and energy can be converted into each other under certain circumstances, so the broader law is conservation of mass-energy. Nuclear power is based upon the conversion of mass to energy.
I am not sure how much of a proof this is; but light energy is involved both in conservation of energy, and in conservation of momentum. A photon has both energy and momentum.I am not sure how much of a proof this is; but light energy is involved both in conservation of energy, and in conservation of momentum. A photon has both energy and momentum.I am not sure how much of a proof this is; but light energy is involved both in conservation of energy, and in conservation of momentum. A photon has both energy and momentum.I am not sure how much of a proof this is; but light energy is involved both in conservation of energy, and in conservation of momentum. A photon has both energy and momentum.
Both conservation laws are applied. The conservation of momentum and conservation of energy. However, in an inelastic collision, kinetic energy is not conserved. But total energy IS CONSERVED and the principle of conservation of energy does hold.
working models for energy conservation are:- * * * * *
There are no "laws" of conservation of energy, just the law of conservation of energy. The existence of friction doesn't change anything - the law of conservation of energy still holds.