If you hit it hard enough.
When they invented concrete. Roman concrete set underwater and was used to build harbours.
about 1/6 of that on land
Yes it can. It actually cures harder under water then above it. True.
To build underwater foundations for the docks of some ports the Romans used concrete.
There is not a precise count. The Romans used concrete extensively. They used it for large buildings, bridges, and aqueducts though stone and brick were used as well in a concrete construction. As Roman concrete also set underwater, it was also used to build ports.The biggest building which was made mainly in concrete is the Colosseum.
It is also used for bridge counter-weight and for weighting down underwater pipelines etc.....Dan
Tremie is not a "mix" but rather is a method of placing concrete underwater. It would seem to me, and I work in construction, that you would be needlessly adding cost. Why not simply use "normal" concrete for "normal" structures? Here is a link: http://www.concreteconstruction.net/industry-news.asp?sectionID=718&articleID=243445
Roman concrete was neither better nor worse. It was different. It was as strong as modern concrete and it set underwater. It was less fluid and it had to be layered by hand. The Romans did not use reinforced concrete. Roman concrete was made by mixing pozzonlana (an active component of volcanic pumices and ashes) with lime and adding an aggregate to give it body. This varied depending of the consistency or weight. It could be pottery sherds, crushed brick or crushed rock.
Concrete, as well as many epoxy mixes will harden underwater. Someone needs to be IN the water to properly apply the patch material.
It was an alternative to stone. Instead of chiseling stones to the proper shape, the concrete was poured into a form and shaped. It was also easier to transport than stones weighing several tons. Concrete is prefab stone.
An underwater camera, is a camera that works underwater.