answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The end section 'equally capable as the British officers' sounds a little clumsy.

You could say they were 'as capable as the British officers'.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is wrong with this sentence 'Indians were denied higher posts in the civil services in spite of being equally capable as the British officers'?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Did England have a nice relationship with the Indians?

You mean the natives in the revolutionary war? well they hired and or forced them to be guides if they know the local land. as the mercenaries and british officers did not know the American land


Why were the Indians were unhappy with the British rule?

Because the British treated the Indians like slaves


Why were the British superior to he Indians?

Primary reason is because British were more disciplined than Indians.


What were the Metis were a mixture of British or French and Indians?

it was the British and Indians i am thinking. i could be wrong though


Which Indians were allied with the British?

The Iroquois Indians The Iroquois Indians The Iroquois Indians


Do you think it was easier for rich Indians or poor Indians to live under British rule?

it was easier for rich indians to live under british rule


How did the French make peace with the Indians?

They did not need to as the French and Indians were allies against the British. The British won the war.


What did the British encourage the Indians to grow instead of food?

The British encouraged the Indians to grow cotton instead of food.


Why did Americans dislike the british support of Indians?

because they were part of the indians


Did the British and the American Indians get on together?

no


Who attacked the creek Indians?

British


Who invented sports?

The British and Indians.