Homework questions should be answered by the student - to show they understoodthe lesson - not the world-wide community !
Montresor's actions in "The Cask of Amontillado" suggest that he is both sane and unreliable. His meticulous planning and manipulation of Fortunato demonstrate his sanity, but his vengeful and deceitful nature makes him an unreliable narrator. While Montresor's actions may be seen as justified from his perspective of seeking revenge, his malicious intent to murder Fortunato over a slight makes him morally questionable.
Montresor is considered an unreliable character in Edgar Allan Poe's short story "The Cask of Amontillado." He deceives and manipulates his victim, Fortunato, leading him into a trap under false pretenses. Montresor's narration of events is biased and serves his own vengeful motives, making him an untrustworthy narrator.
Some may argue that Montresor's revenge in Edgar Allan Poe's "The Cask of Amontillado" is justified due to the perceived insult he received from Fortunato. However, others may see his actions as extreme and disproportionate to the offense. Ultimately, whether his revenge is justified is subjective and open to individual interpretation.
Unreliable narrator. The usual example of this is 'The Cask of Amontillado' by Edgar Alan Poe, wherein the narrator Montresor is progressively seen as been mad rather than credible.
The structure of Edgar Allan Poe's short story "The Cask of Amontillado" suggests Montresor's deceptive nature and manipulation of events. The story unfolds through Montresor's unreliable narration, as he recounts his plan to seek revenge on Fortunato. This creates a sense of ambiguity and manipulation, highlighting Montresor's ability to control both the narrative and the perception of events.
The hook is knowing that Montresor plans on exacting the perfect revenge on Fortunato and reading further to see if he actually does it. Montresor states in the opening that a wrong is not avenged unless the avenger is not caught and that the person who committed the offense must know he is now paying for that offense. The reader gets hooked into continuing into the story to see if Montresor will actually commit the perfect crime and how he will do it.
Seeking revenge through violence is never justified. Killing Fortunato would have been a cruel and inhumane act, perpetuating a cycle of violence and harm. Montresor's actions should have focused on seeking forgiveness and reconciliation instead.
Yes, there is an oxymoron in "The Cask of Amontillado" when Montresor describes Fortunato as "my friend." This is an oxymoron because Montresor's actions and intentions towards Fortunato are malicious and vengeful, not those of a true friend.
Montresor feels he has the right to punish Fortunato because he believes Fortunato has wronged him in some way, possibly insulted him in an unspecified manner. This perceived offense drives Montresor to seek revenge and enact his plan to punish Fortunato.
No. To begin with it is likely that the thousand injuries and insults that Montresor says he has suffered from Fortunato were figments of his imagination. No details of them are given and Fortunato acts very friendly toward Montresor and has no fear of him even while deep down in the cellar. Fortunato does not act like a person who would have committed so many wrongs to Montresor. Even if Fortunato had insulted Montresor, insults are not reason to murder another person.
Montresor is not a dynamic character in "The Cask of Amontillado" because he does not undergo any significant change or growth throughout the story. He remains focused on his revenge against Fortunato and does not show any inner conflicts or development in his personality or beliefs. His motivations and behavior remain constant from beginning to end.
David Montresor's birth name is David Edward Montresor Read.
Frederick Montresor was born in 1811.